Forum Discussion
Heh it seems like you are the one who cries the most here tbh.
Honestly, I think most complains on controller aim assist come from naabs who cant get out of Platinum and also complain on the recoil control and aim of any Diamond3 - to Predator player, calling in "proof of hacks".
Bottom line is that if AA was so OP, then people would just grab a controller on PC and "abuse" it themselves then..... AA sure is strong in the hands of a very skilled controller player but so is m+k in the hands of a very skilled m+k player.....its not like a naab can grab a controller and start melting everything it his path.
@BalladalidilaPC Ranks over diamond are dominated by controller players since season 5, that's how OP it is, at master/pred lobbies 70-80% are controller players at least NA Servers, you cant talk about PC If you haven't being there.
This is Aim Assist.
- Balladalidila5 years agoSeasoned Ace
"PC Ranks over diamond are dominated by controller players since season 5........at master/pred lobbies 70-80% are controller players at least NA Servers"
May I ask where you got these numbers from? I dont deny that AA is very strong in the hands of a skilled controller player, particularly in fast close quarter fights with high DPS guns, where you jump around and toggle between hip and ads all the time. Based on how AA works, i.e, automatically pulling/gravitating your aim towards an enemy in front of you, you would probably land alot of high dmg burst with high dps automatic guns just by shooting "towards" the enemy, when you on M+K would have missed,
But unless you can prove me wrong with some evidence of this "70-80% controller domination at high elo PC", then I seriously doubt that AA would make up for the lack of mid-to-long range precision and movement a skilled M+K player have.
- Balladalidila5 years agoSeasoned Ace
Still waiting for any kind of evidence that "70-80% of all masters and predators on PC are using controllers" haha.
Also; I have also seen those 0.4 and 0.6 settings in the code for pc and console respectively. But neither you or me know how those numbers should be interpreted. You draw the conclusion that its 40 and 60%, but of what? Is 1.00 a sight that is continuously locks on any targets in front of you? We dont know that, do we? We dont even know what scale it it. Is it even linear?
Seems to me that you just spread alot of rumors and false information about the AA issue, some based on your "gut feelings" and some based on your misconception of how the code should be interpreted.
- 5 years ago@Balladalidila Sure ill do it, I'm waiting to my brother to bring me 2 or 3 clips of ranked matches(last split), to do some good statistics just wait.
Ilootgames claimed that the 1.00 on aim assist was full aimbot, and its the maximum value, with that in mind, 0.4 is 40% and 0.6 is 60%
But Im good with the .6 on console, i know all the disadvantages (fps, frame latency, playing on TV, etc) but why having aim assist on PC?.
That's where is trully cancer, controller players with full 144-240fps, 144hz-240hz monitors, and 40% aimassist is way too much, on Pc there're no disadvantages at all while using a controller.
In all my aim assist threads i always said that the problem was PC, not Console.
About Apex Legends Feedback
Community Highlights
Recent Discussions
- 24 minutes ago
- 11 hours ago
- 19 hours ago