Why is the ranked based off placement and not kills? SO Stupid.
The fact that placement out scores kills to me is the stupidest thing a shooting game can ever have in ranked. Thoughts?
Forum Discussion
@r1ggedgame wrote:@Asmodeus566the nice thing about math is, i can use it too to prove my point :
10 kills for 5th 160+45 makes 205 and the 1st got 175 Points with 2 Kills which is a very likely scenario, equals kills outscore placement.
The math doesnt lie.
In the End, its a Battle Royal and the Point System was changed to fit the game type.
Before you could play it as TDM and get decent points no matter the placement,
now you have to play it as a BR otherwise you wont profit until a certain placement threshold is reached.
@r1ggedgame thank you for proving my point: The game is a battle royal, always has been, so it should always have been played like that and it is good that the updated the RP system to better reflect that placement matters and that it is greater than KP.
@Asmodeus566where do i prove your point ?
i dont see where 175 points for 1st outscores 205 points for 5th place.
Placement only matters until you reached the threshold, then you can score higher with more kills than somebody placed higher with less kills. so placement isnt really greater as KP as you describe.
Would be nice to have the numbers on how many 2nd placed got more RP than the actual winner of the round.
Community Highlights
- EA_Mako5 months ago
Community Manager
- EA_Mako6 months ago
