Forum Discussion

fartnitepalyer's avatar
fartnitepalyer
4 years ago

*Snip* gets only temp banned for abusing speedhack glitch for 2 days

How is it okay that this person gets only temp banned for abusing a speedhack glitch for 2 days straight on multiple accounts? Any other user would have been perma banned as it is a violation of To...
discussion
RevMainPls's avatar
RevMainPls
4 years ago

@fartnitepalyerWhy should someone get permabanned for abusing a bug ? It wasnt even something gamebreaking...

While i agree someone shouldnt abuse a bug on purpose, doesnt mean they should get permabanned for the companys fault. The bug existed long enough and its on respawn to solve theese issues, but they take years to fix bugs...

What they shouldve done is give him a temp ban on his main account and hotfix the issue... instead they did let in the game and banned more of his accounts wich is madness

fartnitepalyer's avatar
fartnitepalyer
4 years ago
@RevMainPls because its IN THEIR POLICY. ITS IN THEIR TERMS OF SERVICE. THE SAME TERMS OF SERVICE THEY HOLD PEOPLE ACCOUNTABLE FOR AS SEEN HERE https://answers.ea.com/t5/General-Discussion/Nothing-verbal-should-constitute-a-Hardware-ID-ban-Prove-me/m-p/11197366/highlight/true#M195886

@E9ine_AC
AND I QUOTE:
Use or distribute unauthorized software programs or tools (such as "auto", "macro", hack or cheat software), or use exploits, bugs or problems in an EA Service to gain unfair advantage.


HOW IS IT THAT USING A CURSE WORD CAN GET PEOPLE PERMA BANNED BUT NOT ABUSING BUGS THAT GIVE AN UNFAIR ADVANTAGE?

MAKES NO SENSE. @E9ine_AC
  • RevMainPls's avatar
    RevMainPls
    4 years ago
    @fartnitepalyer I never said he shouldnt get banned... but permanent is just not justified for their incompetence...