@Zhukov211 wrote:@PsubondBF4 Engineer disagrees. You can carry 6 AT mines or 6 SLAM mines or 2 AA mines and 4 RPGs per Engineer with the right perk. An RPG that can one shot any aircraft in game.
Carry that same lethality over to 2042 I don’t think your theory checks out my friend.
And exactly what is an engineer going to do about stealth helos and transports? If you tell me you can reliably hit an aircraft with an M5 i am calling bs. And how many people will be running engineer? And of those people how many will run stingers? If you lock loadouts will anyone use rao?
I don't think your theory checks out
It is TOO LATE to lock down loadouts. The game has been out for nearly 9 months
@PsubondSRAW, SMAW, Javelin + SOFLAM.
And apparently you missed the part about also carrying 2 AA mines. Do you even know what those are and how they work?
Youre trying to discredit a system that’s worked superfluously in very popular Battlefield games while suggesting the most unpopular game of the franchise has a superior system.
Rao is a gadget with a specific skin and nothing more. A gadget an Engineer could carry along with a few Stingers or RPGs.
@Zhukov211 wrote:
@PsubondSRAW, SMAW, Javelin + SOFLAM.
And apparently you missed the part about also carrying 2 AA mines. Do you even know what those are and how they work?
Yep. I know how they work, i have specifically hunted vehicles since battlefield 2. i guess i missed the patch that added them to 2042.
You can argue that YOU want to control how people play through classes and thar YOU would prefer it, but you can't argue that it would improve the game or bring players back because you cant prove that. but it doesnt matter. What you posted is merely a wish list and i dont think the people who have a control fetish in regards to locking down loadouts will get what they want. Specialists arent going away, they are there for micro transactions
@PsubondBro stop making this about me. How silly. I’m echoing the sentiment of the hundreds of thousands of Battlefield fans world wide. Don’t slay the messenger.
And again, it’s not my list. There are dozens of similar lists out there from various gaming publications, game reviewers, streamers and players from around the world all covering the same missing features.
June 21, 2022:
"So we want to improve the core gameplay experience and that is what we have focused on.”
“..it's important for us to improve Battlefield 2042 and the experience that we can provide to our players. We owe them that."
“..considering the negative reaction to 2042, it must have been tempting to draw a line under the game and simply move on. But ****** insists that was never an option.”
“As I said, we owe it to our players."
"We are only focusing on Battlefield 2042. There is no time for anything else and this is what we want to do.”
“We’re completely focused on Battlefield 2042. The majority of the team here, plus our colleagues over at Ripple Effect, are focused on Battlefield 2042. We owe that to our community, to our players, “
WHERE IS THE CONTENT? WHERE IS THE COMMUNICATION?
