Forum Discussion

Stew360's avatar
Stew360
3 years ago

BF 2042 128 players conquest maps are a millions time better than Reclaimed 64

Well its sad to see that some of the most ignorants in BF franchises history made DICE doubts themselves about the 128 players map design ..  Of course there was some improvements to be made .. more...
discussion
xpaydayx's avatar
xpaydayx
3 years ago

Reclaimed is a bottom of the barrel uninspired one laned garbage fire. The only good map in the game is exposure (conquest) and I truly believe that. Exposure genuinely encapsulates the combined arms aspect of BATTLEFIELD like no other map in the game. The verticality and indoor areas afford you many different ways to play the round. The weakest part of the map is the fact that when you're out in the open you're REALLY out in open and a trillion sightlines let snipers pick you off. And that is a serious critique but thats more of a symptom of modern DICE. That exact issue persists throughout every single map in the game. At least with Exposure you can get creative and it's not just a flat boring map. Typically, verticality is bad in competitive games but conquest isn't really meant for the competitive play. It's more sand boxy and more for squad/team play.

Wargame_Enj0yer's avatar
Wargame_Enj0yer
3 years ago
@xpaydayx I think Renewal is also a very good map. Big enough for the vehicles, wisely designed enough to deliver infantry a good experience.
  • xpaydayx's avatar
    xpaydayx
    3 years ago
    @Wargame_Enj0yer Id say I partially agree. The partial-ness stems from the trash "rework". The OG layout was significantly better on 128 with the added hill. Even though cringelords would sit on it and snipe it was still fun to battle around the hill trying to cap those 2 points (A1/2 I think?). They basically removed that entire area for the sake of adding a tiny bit of cover throughout the rest of the map. Yet I've never once made use of the "lanes" they were talking about when they were leading up to the release of Renewal 2.0. All of the reworks are a disgraceful use of resources.
    • JOGAGATYA's avatar
      JOGAGATYA
      Seasoned Ace
      3 years ago
      @xpaydayx Exactly! I think unfortunately the reworks were kind of a waste of resources. Fundamentally they are the same maps. I feel it's important to be vocal about showing support for large maps. Not everyone wants to fight close quarters only. i am saying this before DICE gets the idea of making a new BF with maps ALL looking like Reclaimed. By the way, and i said this many times, while Hourglass is huge, you can also have close quarters fights in the stadium. Genius. Everyone can have fun on that map. (Until maybe the rework....)
      • xpaydayx's avatar
        xpaydayx
        3 years ago
        @JOGAGATYA Yep the only good thing about hourglass is the stadium and it's being removed in favor of "close range cqb indoor single lane" ala metro. Meanwhile the stadium is actually super unique and unlike a lot of things we've seen across the franchise. DICE are just tone deaf and don't know what they're doing.

About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion

Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 2042 in the community forums.15,972 PostsLatest Activity: 2 hours ago