SFAR is a plague fix it OP gun.
Guys, the SFAR buff was unnecessary, it's out performing every other assault rifle in the game. This is ridiculous now. Please review this gun and balance it with other AR's. I'm tired of getting 2...
Forum Discussion
The AC42's TTK values are NOT correct on sym gg. It's slightly more complicated to calculate TTK for burst fire weapons - it's possible that they used the wrong RoF and/or delay between/within bursts to do the calculations.
These values are more accurate:
<30 m - bullets to kill (BTK): 4; TTK: 375 ms [150 ms (1st burst) + 225 ms (delay after burst) + 0 ms (only 1 round shot from 2nd burst, so no time delay)]
30-149 m - BTK: 5; TTK: 450 ms [150 ms + 225 ms + 75 ms (delay between two shots from 2nd burst)]
Full Calculations - https://answers.ea.com/t5/General-Discussion/Some-data-that-justify-minor-buff-for-the-AC42/m-p/11649913#M120060
IMO the ac42 TTK is unnecessarily high - needs a slight buff
@Metal_Daryl97 The AC-42 doesn't need a buff at all - the new laser alone has made the weapon enormously better. There is just a timing how you can fire the weapon faster but I will not explain that here.
- @Ne0tax thanks for the heads up.
removed for security reasons :D
@Ne0taxYou're shooting straight my friend. I actually use the AC-42 myself but still somehow get outclass by the SFAR at over 70-150m.
I've had weird * moments recently were the SFAR magically can follow me around corners and headshot me.
What you are referring to is a BUG - the intended RoF is 159 bursts/min but the glitch allows the weapon to be fired at around 220 bursts/min. The weapon wouldn't have needed a buff if the actual RoF were 220 bursts/min, but that's not the case - again, the TTK is unnecessarily high. Alex (weapon developer) is aware of this and he's probably working on a fix
- @Metal_Daryl97 In BF3 there was the same with the KH2002 and AN-94. Even if it's a bug, it's a lot of fun to learn and master the weapon. =)
