The big map was a step in the right direction
This was one thing i could take away as a positive. Just my opinion of course i know not everybody likes big maps, but i love them. Reminded me so much of BF2 with a big open map to move around, not...
Forum Discussion
I like the Conquest Large maps being as big as possible....the bigger the better for the sandbox experience. BUT if they are going to offer different size variants, then let the players choose which one they want to play on, especially with AI bots being available.
BF 2042 takes it to a whole new level by offering varied terrain within the large maps like indoor areas, open areas, and different terrain all being included in one map! EA is letting you choose between the different map variants within portal, but I'd like to be able to choose between Conquest Large and Small on in the All Out Warfare modes both multiplayer and Solo/Coop since that is where you can obtain progression. I know this potentially divides the player base further but isn't that what we want...more options and content? I really hope EA continues to release the Large maps alongside the smaller variant to choose from if you want.
BF 2042 is shaping up to be one of my favorite games of all time!
Of all the threads to necro, this could be entertaining. I know a few posters in here have had a change of heart lol.
But on topic, are they maps really that big? I'm not feeling it. At least not in the usable area they've put us in. There are large areas no one goes to because there's no flags there. So what's the point? We end up with 128 players fighting in an area no bigger than BF4 maps. In many cases, I guarantee its smaller than maps like Golmud Railway, Giants of Karelia, Silk Road, Dragon Pass, Dragon Valley, etc.
Featured Places
