Yes, I agree. 2042 did need work and it came good in the end. Admittedly, it was painful waiting for things to be added and fixed. It was not by any means good to go out of the box.
what I do find unacceptable is the amount of missing features that were present in a previous title. While I accept that bugs and fixes are needed in a new game, I cannot for the life of me understand why tried and tested features and functionality would be missing in a new title.
Portal for example. 2042 allowed us to change a multitude of settings when creating a server. There are a load of settings missing in BF6’s portal compared to what is available in 2042’s.
Why is this?
in 2042’s portal, they game us game mode templates that we could pick up and use. These are missing completely in BF6.
They have literally gone backwards with things.
Regarding re-skinning 2042. I do agree with what you say. However, the irony is, I suspect a lot of people would have been happy with getting 2042’s UI, functions and features with BF6 soldiers, tone and environmental settings.
i would have said BF6’s maps, but sadly, for the most part, they are awful.