@EA / DICE

Question

Hello&nbsp;&nbsp;I just like many here have a lot of hours in BF. Do us a favor PLEASE.&nbsp; Consider adding previous BF-3 maps to BF-6. NO CHANGES.. Just the way they were. Don't revise anything. Take a look at your map rotation in sessions&nbsp; If people are not playing certain maps. Then Drop it and add a BF-3 MAP.&nbsp; Keep your community active with good maps players actually enjoy playing.&nbsp; See what people are choosing in the custom searches and go from there.&nbsp;You don't need to reinvent the wheel. Keep it simple. Use maps that were popular in the past and focus on fixing bugs &amp; keep updating the Anti cheat. ( Protect your product &amp; players )Caspian Border,Operation Metro,Noshar Canals,Kharg Island.&nbsp; Would be a great start.&nbsp;If anyone agrees.. Please like this. 😁

lambsaw804 · Answer

I second this. The maps that are fun include Mirak Valley, Siege of Cairo, Operation Firestorm, and Liberation Peak. However, despite different architecture and settings, the objective layouts feel repetitive. Too many maps follow the same formula: a box-like structure with four objectives around the outer perimeter and one objective in the middle. This pattern repeats across multiple maps, making them feel samey.

So many classic Battlefield maps like Strike at Karkand, Wake Island, and Gulf of Oman were endlessly replayable because they had unique, organic layouts. Battlefield 6 needs more variety in its Conquest objective placement to recapture that magic and larger maps.

Forum Discussion

@EA / DICE

1 Reply

Featured Places

Battlefield 6 General Discussion

Community Highlights

[GUIDE] EA Account Help: No Access, Disabled Accounts, Hacks, Bans, and More

Recent Discussions

DICE Ban This Guy

Fix the battlepass I don't have some rewards and skins

Hackers

I WAS BAN 3 WEEKS AGO HELPS!

AA lock-on missiles are ineffective