High explosive should kill infantry in one hit

I agree. I do hate the RPG and noob tube put I agree they should kill infantry in one hit. I have been hit with rpgs recently any lost an average of 40Hp. 

I have shot an engineer on the back of the take and done only 10 damage to the engineer and 20 damage to the tank.

Same with c4 I throw C4 in a corner where we had 3 campers and it did nothing took literally all 4 of them to kill.

Same for a take in I do a HIGH SKILL move getting close to a take an plant 4 c4 on the back I expect it to die and not roll away with 10hp.

Same for claymores if a enemy runs past it without checking I should get the kill not him running away with 90hp.

If you really want do do something make SMGs have more bloom at 30+ m. 

Or how about this fix the problem the game had from release day one. Hitreg net code how about that

Here's the thing vx_firedragon_xv​, our Devs love to hear your feedback, good and bad. They take it all on board and use it to help shape the future of the game.

But that said, rude and abusive feedback doesn't get shared as often. You can vent, be frustrated, angry and even dismissive so long as your feedback is constructive.

If it's not, then it's not as likely to be shared with the team. 

So if you have feedback on the game and want to see change made that's a good thing and we are here to facilitate it, we just ask that it's constructive and at least a little polite. 

Darko

The claymore should deal 100 damage again. The one that really bugs me though is the HE launcher. I hit the same guy on the body with 3 shots while he was sniping at people the other direction and it didn't fully kill him. The shells were literally hitting his body and it wasn't even enough for him to notice. What the heck?

BF HAS always been the most realistic shooter.

-- Man who has only played Battlefield and Doom.

Learn what ARMA is, even something like Insurgency is more realistic. LOL

Im always going to be aggressive when talking to these brainless nits. nothing changes unless the community expresses strong distaste for their idiocy. 

I've been closer to war that you'll ever be I'm certain of that. BF HAS always been the most realistic shooter. 

tank rounds should be a one hit kill, if they hit a person, or depending on the round near by. most tank rounds dont explode in the traditional sense. they are designed to kill armored vehicles and with reactive armor exploding on impact is ineffective. they are designed to penetrate the armor and kill everything thats inside it. the idea of tanks having big splash damage is absurd. 

d69fd7d9150d78c9 wrote:

because than tanks would have to be one or two hit to the rear and let me guess, you would complain about that?

they used to be until recently, meanwhile the HE shells were even worse than now.

the fact is that there is no tangible benefit of using the HE shells over the starting middle ground shells. They might as well delete them if they do not want them to do their job

BF has never been realistic, you just obviously haven't been to war and your only experience is being an armchair soldier in video games.

because than tanks would have to be one or two hit to the rear and let me guess, you would complain about that?