Thank you for the response. I do understand that the forums are not able to directly resolve this type of issue.
However, that is precisely the point of my original post. The concern is not just about this specific case, but about the lack of flexibility and administrative support within the current process. Situations like this particularly those involving compromised accounts highlight a clear gap in the system.
There should be, at a minimum:
A clear and explicit warning prior to linking accounts about the 6-month restriction
An escalation path for verified cases, especially when account security incidents are involved
Administrative support with the authority to review and resolve exceptions when appropriate
Without these, customers are left with no viable path to correct unintended actions, even when circumstances are fully explained and verified. I hope this feedback can be taken into consideration for future improvements to the support process.