Discrepancy

I think someone once wrote something like this ...

“Hits with any Player” normal hits and shoulder checks. Summary after the game only shows normal hits

This doesn't sound like a big problem. At least it's better like this than if the in-game stats showed 6 hits but only 2 hits counted for the objective. Do you agree? And if Phasto's explanation is correct, I think it's just a positive thing that shoulder checks count for hits objectives even though they aren't counted in the in-game stats. But yes, it would definitely make sense if they counted as hits in the in-game stats as well and we would see the same number of hits in the in-game stats as in the objectives. But as long as it's the objectives that have a bigger number of hits, I don't see it as a big problem.

Since there is no definitive description as to the meaning of hit in this game. A hit that is registered to one segment, should also echo on another. We are not talking about checks here. Like in shoulder check. My post was to point out that the game and objectives. Play to a different piper.

I agree, but I don't fully understand the negativity about a small issue like this that also has a positive aspect. I tried to point out the positive aspect, which is the fact that the objectives register more hits than the in-game stats (it would be worse if it was the other way around), but you are still only talking about the negative aspect. It's almost as if you want EA to change the objectives to only count normal hits and not shoulder checks, but I don't believe that's what you want. I believe you agree with me that EA should fix the issue by changing the in-game stat to count shoulder checks as well instead of only normal hits. Am I right?

A shoulder check sounds like a hit to me. Because a hit, to me, is another name for a body check. All checks should be hits. 

I just cannot grasp how you seem to miss the point. Its not a major issue. Never said it was. My question is. Why are the two hit recorders not in sync. You make 10 hits in tbe game. One says 10 the other says 6. Example. Why? Answer me that, and you solve the query. And objectives at times specify shoulder checks. So. There is a difference. But to state hits on both. Means hits. Regardless of what they are. And I'm not asking EA to change anything here. It is a question of misproportion in totals

I don't think I'm missing the point. I didn't answer the question because Phasto already answered it. Phasto said that the numbers are different because the objective includes normal hits (body checks) and shoulder checks whereas the in-game stat only includes normal hits. Is that not a sufficient explanation?

If you want to know why shoulder checks aren't included in the in-game stat, don't ask me. I have no idea. Someone from EA would need to explain that.

And objectives at times specify shoulder checks. So. There is a difference.

Yes, of course there is a difference. No one is saying that shoulder checks and hits are the same thing. What we are saying is that a shoulder check is a specific type of a hit. And a body check (which is what Phasto refers to with a "normal hit") is another one. You can compare this to different types of shots. There can be an objective for shoulder checks, there can be an objective for body checks, and there can be an objective for just hits which includes both body checks and shoulder checks. But for some reason that I don't know, the in-game stat for hits only includes body checks and not shoulder checks.

And even though you aren't directly asking EA to change anything, you are implying that you would like to see the in-game stat and the objective being consistent with each other. And I agree with you. I would like to see that as well. And it could be achieved by changing the in-game stat to include shoulder checks like the objectives. I don't believe you would be against that change. And I wouldn't be against it either. I think it would be a good change.

And the "doesn't sound like a big problem" and "I don't see it as a big problem" were just general comments about the issue. I know you didn't say it was a big problem or anything like that.

Do you understand it now or is something still unclear?

The issue at question here is not interpretations, but rather consistency. Perfect one timer shots vs One timer shots. Hits vs shoulder checks. Explicit. To the point. Hit. If one venue of the game sees it as a hit. And another doesnt. Like my post stated. We have a discrepancy. Failure to interpret. Why I proposed the post as a question. One which you or Phasto honestly can't explain. Nothing against either of you. Its EA I want the answer from.

So. This answer you gave me. EA explained it to you. If not. Your surmising. I really can't understand how after I cited to you in the last post. Acceptance by one part of the game. And non acceptance by a different one. Give me EAs actual definition as they have given you, to explain the difference. I am assuming that this is where your actual facts are coming from. The POINT is. Hit. I don't care how you and Phasto have assumed the reason. I wanted to know why its a hit in one part of the game. And not in another. It does not mention shoulder check whatever. Just hit(s). I don't recall any post explaining what EA actually means by hit. And until they do. Your answer. Phasto's or anyone else. Is just speculation. Like I said in the Post. I wasn't asking the community for an answer. It was worded to EA. I'm done responding.  I'm going to mark your comment as solved. To end this tennis match of words.