Forum Discussion
@TwoHeadedTOM I definitely hear ya. All I want as well is for this mode to be in an enjoyable state and it still isn't.
Unfortunately, this year they have been playing from behind since the release and each month they have had to fix game breaking bugs. Scouting, chemistry, edit lines, trade values and the record book have all had to be fixed this year so its safe to say the pandemic has hit this mode extra hard.
I was personally excited when I saw that they introduced the ability to choose your draft class quality this year. Ever since they introduced scouts I have found it too easy to build strictly through the draft and there wasn't much need for trades or free agents other than placeholder spots while your prospects develop. I get that most guys like just drafting/developing and that's cool too, at least we had options this year. Now of course what is happening is not a good thing and is clearly a bug as putting up good stats need to grow appropriately, especially the franchise and elite potential players. I have yet to be able to test out the different options to see if there are in fact or prospects that don't develop into what they are supposed to or these options only control how many elite players are in later rounds. Once the turnover of real players is complete, it seems the mode will be basically over (so 8-10 years...), but I am still going to get into a franchise now and see if I can notice if this is happening to all cpu generated players if of course I get that deep into it before the next patch. (the roster turnover may just be too much for me to handle as well, we shall see)
- 5 years ago@Beauts90 yeah it doesn’t make any sense for players to get negative NATURAL growth when putting up a good season and getting an overall boost. And then dropping like crazy before they halfway through the next season.
If the prospect quality only controls how many elite players are in the later rounds, then that’s stupid. It should be overall. Instead of the top 15-20 being elites, make 10ish elites, and top 6/top4s instead, and have them actually develop instead of hitting a wall at 79-82.
It’s definitely too easy to get good prospects every, especially the elite goalies of nhl 19&20. Always draft 1 or two elite goalies every year it was dumb.
When I finish my set and get days off, perhaps I’ll try and run some sims and record some data too. It’s a good idea, and props to you for helping out man. Maybe if we keep talking, and trying, EA will do something.. doubtful, but maybe. - Beauts905 years agoSeasoned Ace
I will say this. I am more than ok with prospects not reaching their potential. In fact, I encourage it as long as its reflected in their stats which is not the case we have here. In real life there are way more players drafted that don't pan out than those that do including some higher picks. If I pick a guy with franchise potential first overall I'm ok if they don't develop into a 95 overall and I'm even ok if they are a complete bust as long as the reasoning makes sense and its not due to a bug. If they only put up 20-30 points a year I don't think they should grow very much at all. You don't want stats to matter and would prefer if your players always developed? Great, give us the option to turn it on/off or have difficulty settings. As @SchulzEricT has been saying, give us more options on how we want to play the game.
- 5 years ago@Beauts90 I think we’re mixed up here, I’m at work and rushed replies. I’m happy with prospects not working out. But I mean the prospects that are top 4, top 6 seem to never pan out, only the elites so. They should make top 4 and top 6 more impactful. And they should lessen the amounts of elites.
If prospects don’t put up points, they shouldn’t grow. But they also shouldn’t NOT grow, because they don’t put up points. If that makes sense. There needs to be a balance. But yes @SchulzEricT has always hit the nail on the head. Let us customize the game so EA doesn’t have to try and balance everything because they clearly are inept at doing that - Beauts905 years agoSeasoned Ace
@SkylerJames13 I get what you are saying. I definitely think we are all pretty much on the same page here.
First things first, let's get the bugs worked out.