Personally, I am terrible at playing plants, but that's not because they are worse, nor is it the other way around. It's because of my lack of experience playing plants. Can't we just accept that maybe neither Plants or Zombies are OP, and that maybe it is merely a lack of experience, mixed in with the occasional unbalanced card?
Well then why are there no high zombie players
I'm fine @patdk75, thanks for worring about me. Things just got a little messy around here. (Aaaaaaand I got sick. )
Those things aside, pat is right @jasterrogue1.
There are both plant and zombie players in all leagues, it is just a matter of personal playstyle.
Your thoughts is like me saying: "I always win 9/10 games with control decks, but I only win 3/10 times with aggro decks. Aggro decks suck."
Well, that is true for you, but it doesn't mean it is true for everyone.
I LOVE zombies. I find them more interesting according to playstyle than plants. They are more "tricky" to play.
When you play a Plant deck... that's it. You know what is their whole turn on their sole phase.
When you play a Zombie deck however, if you save 1, 2 or 3 brains the plant heroe play carefully. (Most of the time)
Uuuuuuuhh... does he have a Rocket Science and that's why he saved 3 brains?
Does he have this card? Is he going to play THIS card? etc
It's like... playing mind games with your opponent. And I love it.
And I know more players do as well, but not ALL of them.
But just remember, just because something applies to you, doesn't mean is the only one true opinion.
Yea I play now both alternating. I have now a pretty strong zombie deck but still clique peas ar driving me so mad 😠. There are four decks I see commonly on zombie side: the fat guy with invincible zombies, the professor trick deck, imps and grave digger. On plant decks I often see clique peas, lilies and mass heal. My Pirat deck is pretty fun and I am trying to get up the ladder. But right now I am kind of stuck.
