well kids seeing a guy get burnt is different than seeing a just about naked woman and 2 seeing bad stuff on tv and music doesn't justify it and no it would be wrong and wouldn't make since seeing her running around with a gun and you need to get over wanting to see that btw
Your general issue is that it is not appropriate for kids so no it really isn't much different then the violence that is already in Star Wars. All this stuff is already socially accepted and would help make more money from the game so yes it most defiantly is appropriate for BF2 she has had plenty of fight scenes in that outfit too. So again it would be justified. There's nothing inappropriate about it other then some people being overly sensitive.
lol just cause its "socially accepted" doesn't make it right and 2 nobodies gonna buy it cause of that ppl are gonna avoid the game cause of it and its very inappropriate so what your saying makes no sense
"no ones going to buy it" never underestimate the power of Fandoms + Selling sexiness
Also do enlighten us as to how it is inappropriate?
-it shows off just about the same/less as a swimming costume
-In episode 4 we see an Arm being chopped right off, pretty dark. in Episode 3 we see anakin being burned alive by lava quite gruesome really.
Heck going astray to Batman the Chrisopher Nolan's Dark Knight trilogy has a rating of PG-13 (parental guidance required up to age 13) and they are quite dark films
I'd pay money to have the slave outfit for Leia
