3v3 territory war?

"Arus;c-1850829" wrote:

"BattletoadsRash;c-1850746" wrote:
I'm a TW Officer. Based on the comments from other TW Officers in this thread, I'm looking forward to 3v3. Seems this idea is overwhelming for most of you, whereas my guild will figure it out and steamroll you. Thanks for giving up, and thanks for the 3 zetas.

No you won't, we will figure it out if we have to, but why CG makes us have to in the first place?
I don't like this, but it doesn't mean I'm not good at this, just like 3v3 GA, I don't like them, but I won most of them.

Most? Try All ;)

No way am I going to bother leading this... I'm just going to tell everyone to do whatever or they can spend the time enforcing a plan

Which no one will want to do it will be a frustrating mess for everyone involved

Something different, should be fun.

Just stuff a bunch of JKR and Bast teams on D and sprinkle a few DRs behind. Bast will get underestimated and waste some teams, they'll use their jkrs and CLS up on jkr and stall out on the DRs

Obv other teams on D too that you usually use in GA

"DarkstarSunrise;c-1852204" wrote:
3v3 is a terrible game mode, the game was never designed or balanced around 3v3.

So we're back to square one on this thread. For every person who hates it, there's one who loves it.

Let's just play it. They said a while ago that TW is going to be more and more experimental. Best-case scenario you end up really liking it, win, and get 3 zetas. Worst-case scenario you still get 2 zetas and that's not bad.