3v3 territory war?

"Kokie;c-1851740" wrote:
It's because internal data shows them the large majority of players prefer 3v3. The handful of vocal voices on the forum hardly are representative of the hundreds of thousands of players.

what internal data tells them that I like or dislike 3v3.. If there is a semi fair matchup in 5v5 and set a defense that means I like 5v5 ???? and if I get a 3v3 matchup that's completey stupid and have no chance of winning and only set one team that tells them I don't like 3v3 ???

No that only tells them I hate the matchmaking...what data could possibly tell them what I like without asking

3v3 is a terrible game mode, the game was never designed or balanced around 3v3.

3v3 changes the dynamic of the game in a horrible way. You take three overpowered toons together for example DR, BSF, Malak, and you make them impossible to beat except with mirror matches. Then the match is already done based on who has faster speed mods. You take out all the strategy, and fun from this game. I’m not a fan of 3v3 in GA, but in TW how do you deal with two walls of DR? The fewer toons/ships you have to play with the less strategy you have, and then its just who is faster.

Just imagine if chess or checkers was played with three pieces. It would ruin the game because it would just depend on who would go first. Instead of making teams smaller try making team fights larger. I can see 6v6 and 7v7 being really fun, because you have way more strategy. It would need to have longer time limits to help with longer battles, but so much more strategy and thinking involved.

"Jarvind;c-1850399" wrote:

"Arus;c-1850322" wrote:
we need to put in hours and hours to figure out a new strategy for 3v3 tw.

This is overstating the case a little. Most effective 5v5 teams can be whittled down to a 3v3 version that works just as well or nearly so.

A lot of teams are good in 5v5 while sucks in 3v3, like the troopers, Ewoks, other teams like BH are much better in 3v3, counters are completely different.

And the number of teams that can put on defence in each territory will also change, which means you need to reorganize your guild's forces.

Bitches be tripping

Give us 30 or 35 teams per territory first

Bring it on! >:)

Terrible idea in my opinion. I already foresee a bunch of my guild not signing up for it or not participating if they do.

Would a 4v4 be a better compromise ?. I personally like 3v3 over 5v5 because fighting the same dumb meta teams 8 times a day is boring. I can't wait to have 3v3 with bonuses.

"Arus;c-1850322" wrote:
No, it's not interesting at all, it means the old strategy won't works anymore, and we need to put in hours and hours to figure out a new strategy for 3v3 tw.
And using new strategy with unknown consequences is always stressful!

If you're not being sarcastic you may need to take a step back and re-evaluate why you're playing. It's a video game. There's no reason to be getting that stressed out about it.