3vs3 GAC really?
So CG moved the crystal income to GAC making it the most important area of the game, and now they’re forcing us to play a stupid mode they invented just to give players something different a lot of ti...
Forum Discussion
"harvestmouse;c-2355877" wrote:"CCyrilS;c-2355853" wrote:"Obi_six_Kenobi;c-2355851" wrote:
I’m somewhat new to GAC, I hear a lot of people saying the don’t like 3v3. But I haven’t heard anyone explain why. Can someone please explain what it is about 3v3 that bothers many people?
I assume they're too lazy to think for themselves, and are used to relying on tried and true defenses and counters that were figured out by other people.
When it actually gets going I don't mind it. However, it's kind of GAC 'lite'. A diluted version of the game. It's never been as popular as the 5v5, which the whole balance is based around.
If it isn't as popular as 5v5, why bring it back? On another thread a guy had a good idea of replacing arena with it. That sounds fun.
The big problem for me is; we've been working towards getting everybody in their right place for GAC leagues. Now that's all going to be upset by a totally different format.
What was popular, was GAC without ships. It was temporarily removed though because of the GP problem. Now, GP is no longer a problem.
What would be most popular if you had standard GAC, 3v3 or 5v5 no ships? I know which I'd most like to play. And it ain't 3v3 or ships!
We all knew 3v3 was/is a thing, so the excuse that we're all "getting things in place for 5v5" is willful ignorance. Especially given that arena has virtually no bearing anymore.
I wouldn't mind seeing the no ships GAC in rotation occasionally. Honestly anything a little different is welcome from time to time.
