"Stenun;c-1878156" wrote:
I wonder how many people in this thread who have the opposite view to me would have accepted it if they'd been told that the Malak requirements were a good thing because it would otherwise have been too hard for them and if they were a serious player they'd have the requirements anyway so go back to getting CLS which is better to have some rewards than try this one and get none ... etc, etc, etc.
I personally think that the malak requirements were a good thing.
No matter what they do, people will complain. If they didn't have the 17.5k GP / 80m GP requirements, people would complain it's too hard, if they do have the requirement, people will complain they should have atleast gotten the chance to participate. Have you read the complaints of any given event in regards to the "recommended gear/zeta lvl"? That about says it all imo.
As for the topic of the thread, it remains to be seen if it's a good call by ea/cg. If 80/85m GP guilds enjoy and get better rewards from hoth than from geo, it's better to just protect those sub 80m GP guilds from themselves and save them the dissappointment.
I'm relatively sure that quite a few guilds were wasting rewards by doing t6 STR instead of t5, so it's not like guildleaders/officers always make the best choices for their guilds. Not trying to be a di..., but i'd reckon not making the best choices is more common for the sub 80m GP/casual guilds.
