Circle of logic
I wanna start by saying this post is a question. I’m actively looking for someone to piece this together for me in a respectful way if I’m missing something obvious. I don’t write code and I’m not fam...
Forum Discussion
"littleMAC77;c-2097703" wrote:
The difference is sandbox mode is additional work effort that will be regularly utilized by a minority of existing players. Having you game run on older dervices may directly benefit a small group, but that is so that more players can play the game at all. Two very different ideas between new content that doesnt advance your roster for a small group, and allowing more people to play your game.
I personally don’t care about a sandbox mode, even if a lot of people do, but I like the idea of a guild PvP to substitute or something more casual to play and learn. Also @littleMAC77 i see a lot of people, who I assume are moderators, keep repeating that “a small group of people want sandbox”. Is there a poll or any community facing analytics available somewhere that reflects this? I legit hear this A LOT. Yet from my scope of the community, which is small yes but still an alliance of 13 guilds, it’s a resounding yes for sandbox or something similar. Typically I’m hearing the message “the few are just loud” or “people who like the game don’t post on forums it’s just complainers so that’s why we see it so much”. Can you provide any insight on how CG or its forum mods came to the conclusion? Please don’t take that as a jab or me trying to argue. I just was curious :)
