Do you consider deathstorm a cheese?

"TVF;c-1982425" wrote:

"Bulldog1205;c-1982424" wrote:
I don’t really support banning it by guilds.

I don't think your opinion really matters on the subject other than in your one guild.

Or eight guilds, maybe.

Nobody’s opinion really matters at all here. That’s kind of what forums are for though.

"Ultra;c-1982551" wrote:

"Bulldog1205;c-1982424" wrote:
I guess we have to define what you mean by cheese. It’s a “cheap trick” type of team, for sure. But it’s something that operates within the confines of the game, so it’s a legal team, and I don’t really support banning it by guilds.

My guild banned it but I think it should be allowed. For the same reasons stated here.

The biggest reason I objected was that it’s not enforceable. People will just do it but “only” get 50% or something like that. And heck, deathstorm can solo the phase anyways without Anakin, it just takes really good RNG.

"Bulldog1205;c-1982667" wrote:

"TVF;c-1982425" wrote:

"Bulldog1205;c-1982424" wrote:
I don’t really support banning it by guilds.

I don't think your opinion really matters on the subject other than in your one guild.

Or eight guilds, maybe.

Nobody’s opinion really matters at all here. That’s kind of what forums are for though.

The forums are for you saying what other guilds should do, which is no one's business but their own?

k

Duplicate

He literally posted "I don’t really support banning it by guilds."

And his follow up was not "I only meant for my guild" now was it? If that's what he meant, he could have said so with the second post.

I thought his initial post was clear and I understood what he meant by the "banning by guilds" thing.

"ronnio;c-1982875" wrote:
I thought his initial post was clear and I understood what he meant by the "banning by guilds" thing.

Again, he could have said so in the follow-up, but instead he decided to tell me what the forums are for. Ok.

"TVF;c-1982942" wrote:

"ronnio;c-1982875" wrote:
I thought his initial post was clear and I understood what he meant by the "banning by guilds" thing.

Again, he could have said so in the follow-up, but instead he decided to tell me what the forums are for. Ok.

And yet, you obviously feel your opinion of his opinion holds weight.

Ok...

"UnbelieverInME;c-1982978" wrote:

"TVF;c-1982942" wrote:

"ronnio;c-1982875" wrote:
I thought his initial post was clear and I understood what he meant by the "banning by guilds" thing.

Again, he could have said so in the follow-up, but instead he decided to tell me what the forums are for. Ok.

And yet, you obviously feel your opinion of his opinion holds weight.

Ok...

(edit to note): I'm not trying to be an ***. Reading it back to myself it sounds like I am, but it's not my intention. I just don't understand the logic of who's opinion supposedly matters. Why is your opinion of him more valid than his opinion of guilds banning Deathstorm?

"TVF;c-1982942" wrote:

"ronnio;c-1982875" wrote:
I thought his initial post was clear and I understood what he meant by the "banning by guilds" thing.

Again, he could have said so in the follow-up, but instead he decided to tell me what the forums are for. Ok.

He posted a response to the topic. And said his piece. Which really didn't need further explanation.

You came in and busted his balls. And yet, didn't bother to make mention of your opinion on the topic. Keep trolling.

Ok?