Executor is a beast? [MERGE]

"wildnz;c-2287438" wrote:
Ironic we get a reminder about upcoming character changes , that are explained in part as ensuring any counter has a comparable investment to the team it is countering. The same philosophy does not seem to have been applied with Executor. The big caveat , and it is big , is we don't get to see the future like CG do. The criticism is understandable given the frustration , but let's give them time to show us the finished product. The only feedback I have for CG is, if indeed we will see new ships to take the Executor to the top of the meta on defense, why antagonize your customers and put yourself in this position. Why not announce a full roadmap ?

The investment for the other fleets is only slightly lower than what has to go into Executor. It's just people have already done it in the past.

Almost everything you put into Executor is going to be used within the finished fleet. Can't say that for a rebel fleet (chewy and HMF unlocks) for example. Or for the GET2 cap ships. Lots of investment all over roster to improve GET2 income.

I think the Executor being a bit better is about right for the comparative cost.