GAC opponent

"Hiker1;c-2220028" wrote:
This GAC has been atrocious with 3v3 and matchmaking. I routinely pull players that have over a million more GP then I, with way more zetas and a much deeper roster than I. If those were my only issues, I could probably overcome that. When you factor in that every opponent I have had so far has had 3 GLs to my 1, I have zero chance. There needs to be a new division added to make things more fair. 3v3 limits GL counters. Many in my arena shard have the same experiences.

Your opponents with multiple GLs chose to gear/relic characters that unlock GLs instead of taking their BH, NS and JKR teams to high relic levels along with single characters like JTR and Plo Koon like you did. They built rosters more suitable for GAC than yours. It's fair that they have the benefit.

"Hiker1;c-2220028" wrote:
This GAC has been atrocious with 3v3 and matchmaking. I routinely pull players that have over a million more GP then I, with way more zetas and a much deeper roster than I. If those were my only issues, I could probably overcome that. When you factor in that every opponent I have had so far has had 3 GLs to my 1, I have zero chance. There needs to be a new division added to make things more fair. 3v3 limits GL counters. Many in my arena shard have the same experiences.

If you are facing opponents with 3 GLs to your 1 then you have some serious relic-/zeta-bloat at the top of your roster. That was your choice.

Before I had a GL, I only saw one potential opponent with a GL and his roster was very poorly balanced.

Since acquiring a GL, I see opponents with 0-1 GL. I could conceivably encounter a 2 GL opponent but they would have to have a very poorly balanced roster and there is no way I could encounter a 3 GL opponent without adding a lot more bloat to my own roster.

"Xlor1;c-2206205" wrote:
It's not just relics. it's old ,out of date zetas too. Newer players have an advantage over older players that went hard on zetas when they dropped, which was the way to go.

you have toons with out of date zetas in your top 80?

Just gonna leave this here for laughter.

Your opponent build a smarter GAC roster.

As did I.

TVF vs (name removed but it's metathumper)
========= Overview =========
GP :: 6.2M vs 5.8M
Top 80 GP :: 2.0M vs 2.1M
Char GP :: 3.6M vs 3.3M
Ship GP :: 2.6M vs 2.5M
Squad rank :: 18 vs 34
Fleet rank :: 10 vs 12
========== Relics ==========
Tier 1 :: 3 vs 2
Tier 2 :: 4 vs 3
Tier 3 :: 15 vs 13
Tier 4 :: 3 vs 11
Tier 5 :: 23 vs 17
Tier 6 :: 3 vs 2
Tier 7 :: 12 vs 22

GLs: 3 vs 1

"TVF;c-2220788" wrote:
As did I.

TVF vs (name removed but it's metathumper)
========= Overview =========
GP :: 6.2M vs 5.8M
Top 80 GP :: 2.0M vs 2.1M
Char GP :: 3.6M vs 3.3M
Ship GP :: 2.6M vs 2.5M
Squad rank :: 18 vs 34
Fleet rank :: 10 vs 12
========== Relics ==========
Tier 1 :: 3 vs 2
Tier 2 :: 4 vs 3
Tier 3 :: 15 vs 13
Tier 4 :: 3 vs 11
Tier 5 :: 23 vs 17
Tier 6 :: 3 vs 2
Tier 7 :: 12 vs 22

GLs: 3 vs 1

22 relic 7's with lots of relic 4's and 5's aswell and then he wonders why he faces opponents with such rosters, LOL.
How can you even have so many high relics and only have one GL and no JKL yet...sigh.

"TVF;c-2220787" wrote:
Your opponent build a smarter GAC roster.

A GAC roster you say. I say my roster smacks yours around a few times but that's not the point of this thread. The point is pointing out the system flaws and your comment just acknowledges said point. Built a better GAC roster... just say that a few times in your head until it clicks in on how absurd that even sounds. And if your roster was indeed better for GAC its a shame we would never know now would we. Identical GP you and I have but yet we'll NEVER face one another. Sounds like a quality matchmaking system is in place. Cool g11 Wat you have my man. I'd hate to see you improve him without hurting your oh so easy and manipulated GAC matches

Where does one get those spiffy comparisons? A few in my guild complaining of their matches often, be good to see some accurate stats. Anyone have a link/details please?

"MetaThumper;c-2221001" wrote:

"TVF;c-2220787" wrote:
Your opponent build a smarter GAC roster.

A GAC roster you say. I say my roster smacks yours around a few times but that's not the point of this thread. The point is pointing out the system flaws and your comment just acknowledges said point. Built a better GAC roster... just say that a few times in your head until it clicks in on how absurd that even sounds. And if your roster was indeed better for GAC its a shame we would never know now would we. Identical GP you and I have but yet we'll NEVER face one another. Sounds like a quality matchmaking system is in place. Cool g11 Wat you have my man. I'd hate to see you improve him without hurting your oh so easy and manipulated GAC matches

I'm confused. You say identical gp (I assume the top 80 bc it's almost identical) but would never fase each other? why not? Doesn't the mm say that you WOULD be matched?

I, for one, would love to see your roster "smack around" his 3 gl's in gac tho lol