Grab your popcorn, it's watch the cheaters get banned day!

"KDC99X;c-2409579" wrote:
Umm.. no. You originally tried to project that I was sympathizing with those being banned, or trying to excuse their behavior in some way, and when I called you out on it, now you're backpedaling with semantics and deflection.

Since you're so smart, you should also know not to assume tone in text-based communication, that isn't clearly stated.

Further, my opinion shared in a thread about all of us celebrating cheaters being banned, has absolutelyzero impact whatsoever on CG's tolerance of the described behavior. It's not chipping away at anything, and this entire thread is pointless and doesn't matter anyway, yet you felt the need to single out my response with your shenanigans?

Again, if it's SO POINTLESS, why are you even responding to me, or in this thread at all? Just admit you were wrong, and move on. Or just move on, but stop trying to maneuver like you somehow "one-upped" me by pointing out that my hypothesis has no real world impact on anything. Of course it doesn't. Good job there, Sherlock.

Edit: typo

"nfidel2k;c-2409573" wrote:

"KDC99X;c-2409563" wrote:
Then why are you even bothering to respond to my comment, if it’s so “pointless”?

There’s a lot of “pointless” activity on these forums. Heck the game itself is “pointless”.

So what?

Because there is a difference between a post being pointless and a hypothesis not mattering.

"KDC99X;c-2409563" wrote:

And no you weren’t attacking me, but you were implying meaning that wasn’t there. That’s a lot of effort to put into something “pointless”.

You’re a pretty smart person. I’m pretty sure you are aware that the meaning of a post has more to do with how the reader reads it than what the writer meant. And while I understood your hypothesis, you may have missed that it was chipping away at zero tolerance.

Anyway, I won’t keep going back and forth about this. You shared a hypothesis, I shared my opinion of it. Let’s move on.