There are multiple sith with anti-Jedi traits (maul, sidious, EP, etc.) but no Jedi with anti-sith abilities. Anakin doesn't deal damage to all sith/federation enemies at the end of every turn. Is there a reason there are no anti-sith Jedi?

Agreed I feel his rework would be a perfect way to introduce the anti-sith era. Also, that would just make me happy I love mace I want him to be useable

I believe it's because none of the Jedi were anti-sith. We would need more from the galactic civil war SWKOTR timeframe, when they were actively training to combat the Sith. Whereas those characters on the sith side that were mentioned were actively training to combat the Jedi. Plus, two of the toons you mentioned are the same guy. Vader has his because he actively hunted the Jedi. There was no Jedi, that are in the game, that did this. Mace had one encounter with the sith, and lost. If you read the book, EP played him the entire fight in order to secure Anakin's fall to the dark side.

"Scorpio0193;c-1143650" wrote:I believe it's because none of the Jedi were anti-sith. We would need more from the galactic civil war SWKOTR timeframe, when they were actively training to combat the Sith. Whereas those characters on the sith side that were mentioned were actively training to combat the Jedi. Plus, two of the toons you mentioned are the same guy. Vader has his because he actively hunted the Jedi. There was no Jedi, that are in the game, that did this. Mace had one encounter with the sith, and lost. If you read the book, EP played him the entire fight in order to secure Anakin's fall to the dark side.I'm aware sidious and palpatine are the same person; my point was that there are several sith characters in this game with anti-Jedi traits. That's all well and good, but this game isn't exactly the best representation of Star Wars, and I was speaking more in support of balancing the factions than sticking to exact recreation of the Star Wars canon.

"RandyMarsh;c-1143663" wrote: "Scorpio0193;c-1143650" wrote:I believe it's because none of the Jedi were anti-sith. We would need more from the galactic civil war SWKOTR timeframe, when they were actively training to combat the Sith. Whereas those characters on the sith side that were mentioned were actively training to combat the Jedi. Plus, two of the toons you mentioned are the same guy. Vader has his because he actively hunted the Jedi. There was no Jedi, that are in the game, that did this. Mace had one encounter with the sith, and lost. If you read the book, EP played him the entire fight in order to secure Anakin's fall to the dark side.I'm aware sidious and palpatine are the same person; my point was that there are several sith characters in this game with anti-Jedi traits. That's all well and good, but this game isn't exactly the best representation of Star Wars, and I was speaking more in support of balancing the factions than sticking to exact recreation of the Star Wars canon.I think they are doing a fair representation of canon. Minus a couple confusing affiliations (AT), the toons are set up decently in that regard. As for balancing, it's not as if sith are all that mighty. I'm running a Rex (L) without and zetas and will search for Sith in arena.

Jedi with anti-sith abilities | EA Forums

Shaolin_Punk_66
Retired Hero
8 years ago
Anyone with Tenacity is anti-Sith. But @Boreas wins with his original reply:
"Boreas;c-1143638" wrote:
Sith see Jedi as enemies, they hate them and want to destroy them, Jedi are peaceful, do not hate anyone, including Sith. It's logical.
Acrofales
8 years ago
Hadn't even thought of running sthan. Why run Han with Jedis? Jedis are blazing fast in any case. I run RG (stun, auto taunt) or Shore (pre-taunt, heal). They also both have about a billion times more survivability then STHan.
BTTripleZero
8 years ago
If you want balance, why would you want the Jedi to have anti Sith abilities? Shouldn't it be another faction? Why are we complaining that rock loses to paper so it needs an anti paper ability?
Acrofales
8 years ago
"Bulldog1205;c-1144073" wrote:
If you want balance, why would you want the Jedi to have anti Sith abilities? Shouldn't it be another faction? Why are we complaining that rock loses to paper so it needs an anti paper ability?

Since when are sith (as a faction) paper to Jedi's rocks? It makes sense for there to be anti-sith Jedi, because awhile they acted as peacekeepers of the Galaxy, their main task was always to fight the dark side... and hence Sith.
TheHumourGamesS
8 years ago
We all know windu should be anti everything in the game. But he's not. Which is weird. Suppose striving toward forced metas rather than balance isto blame.
Sutiiiven
8 years ago
"Sith Lords are our speciality"
minetaridge2
8 years ago
Straight from kenobis mouth, sith lords are our specialty. Obviously, he gets smacked around by dooku, but kenobi is still a master.
BarneyStin_sius
8 years ago
"Acrofales;c-1144091" wrote:

Since when are sith (as a faction) paper to Jedi's rocks? It makes sense for there to be anti-sith Jedi, because awhile they acted as peacekeepers of the Galaxy, their main task was always to fight the dark side... and hence Sith.

No, it really wasn't. For the majority of nearly every Jedi's life the Sith were thought to be extinct. The only in-game exceptions to this are possibly Yoda, Barris, Ahsoka, Kanan and Ezra. Yoda is old, and I don't believe we've gotten a new-cannon answer when/why the Sith went underground. Barriss, Ahsoka & Kanan weren't yet padawans when Maul showed up, Ezra wasn't even born.

They can't be anti-Sith, because there were "no" Sith. GK's line about "our specialty" was him talking out his behind, at that point he'd watched his master die to at a Sith's hand and killed exactly 0 himself.

In fact, throughout the entire new-cannon Sith kill scores of Jedi, and Kenobi & Ani(not even really a Jedi at that point) are the only 2 to take a Sith out.
Dark_Helmet152
8 years ago
"StevenFletcher;c-1144440" wrote:
"Sith Lords are our speciality"

Said the man who dies at the hands of a sith lord.
singernixon
8 years ago
"DedrickRogue;c-1144579" wrote:
"Acrofales;c-1144091" wrote:

Since when are sith (as a faction) paper to Jedi's rocks? It makes sense for there to be anti-sith Jedi, because awhile they acted as peacekeepers of the Galaxy, their main task was always to fight the dark side... and hence Sith.

No, it really wasn't. For the majority of nearly every Jedi's life the Sith were thought to be extinct. The only in-game exceptions to this are possibly Yoda, Barris, Ahsoka, Kanan and Ezra. Yoda is old, and I don't believe we've gotten a new-cannon answer when/why the Sith went underground. Barriss, Ahsoka & Kanan were padawans when Maul showed up, Ezra was barely born.

They can't be anti-Sith, because there were "no" Sith. GK's line about "our specialty" was him talking out his behind, at that point he'd watched his master die to at a Sith's hand and killed exactly 0 himself.

In fact, throughout the entire new-cannon Sith kill scores of Jedi, and Kenobi & Ani(not even really a Jedi at that point) are the only 2 to take a Sith out.

As far as anyone knew at that point, Maul was dead. GK wasn't talking out of his behind. He had gone head-to-head with the only other Sith they knew of, specifically, and won. In fact, Kenobi defeated Maul EVERY time they fought, even with Savage's help. And you can't claim "scores of Jedi vs 2 Sith," when there were literally only 2 Sith at a time. If you take that as percentages, it's like 98% Jedi vs 100% of Sith. Jedi win that argument every time.