Mandos mandatory for GC now?

"Itsa_me_Malario;c-2223256" wrote:

"TVF;c-2223254" wrote:

"Itsa_me_Malario;c-2223253" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2223038" wrote:

"Antario;d-241035" wrote:
Does that mean if you don't have decent mando characters moving forward you can kiss bye bye to the red crate?

That applies to all player factions, not just mandos

This goes against what they promised, GC was going to use all of ur roster not 1 faction for half of them, this just shows that CG knows no bounds and will be greedy as hell. I'm so glad I went f2p last year

Nothing is stopping you from using all your roster.

Congrats on your f2p status i guess.

The rewards are tho,

They never promised anyone max rewards, nor should they.

They are just getting everyone to chase and this use materials and crystals before they release the next actual must have GL.

"StarSon;c-2223228" wrote:
Now they are only mandatory for the best box. Second box is do-able without the whatever.

For now.

"Johnnyreb1977;c-2223043" wrote:
Yep another cash grab for good old CG. These Mando toons are awful!!!

These chars are farmable for ftp

Name a more iconic duo. I'll wait:
TVF and Kyno + defending anything and everything CG does.

"th3evo;c-2223990" wrote:
Name a more iconic duo. I'll wait:
TVF and Kyno + defending anything and everything CG does.

forums/reddit + whining about everything

"Legend91;c-2223992" wrote:

"th3evo;c-2223990" wrote:
Name a more iconic duo. I'll wait:
TVF and Kyno + defending anything and everything CG does.

forums/reddit + whining about everything

It's pretty sad that people keep defending billion dollar corporations for free. You should at least try to get paid.

Perhaps you’ve overlooked the simple possibility that others just don’t share your opinions.

"th3evo;c-2224049" wrote:

"Gorgus;c-2224020" wrote:
Perhaps you’ve overlooked the simple possibility that others just don’t share your opinions.

You don't have to share my opinion. You also don't have to defend CG, they can do it themselves.

Your definition of "defending CG" is "disagreeing with me." This is a bad faith line of reason.

"NicWester;c-2224103" wrote:

"th3evo;c-2224049" wrote:

"Gorgus;c-2224020" wrote:
Perhaps you’ve overlooked the simple possibility that others just don’t share your opinions.

You don't have to share my opinion. You also don't have to defend CG, they can do it themselves.

Your definition of "defending CG" is "disagreeing with me." This is a bad faith line of reason.

I don't understand how you can disagree with my criticism of TVF, Kyno and CG but not defend them at the same time when you decide to comment.

see Cambridge Dictionary definition of "DEFEND"
"to protect someone or something against attack or criticism; to speak in favour of someone or something"
or Merriam-Webster definition
"to maintain or support in the face of argument or hostile criticism"