Q: How long will take to CG ban hacker ?! A : inside.......

Time to ban cheaters... indefinite.

Time until this post is closed... pretty soon, I'd wager.

Priorities!

It says Jan 21, I don’t know where 19 is coming from…

I was promised an answer inside...

The sad truth is that CG currently do not ban any cheaters.
The list of 100% obvious cheaters is continually growing, the list of banned cheaters is not.

@crzydroid just wondering why you keep referring people to DM Lucifersdaddy when he has not logged into the forums since Jan. How does this make sense? Serious question.

"crzydroid;c-2372099" wrote:

"Iy4oy4s;c-2372097" wrote:
@crzydroid just wondering why you keep referring people to DM Lucifersdaddy when he has not logged into the forums since Jan. How does this make sense? Serious question.

Whether the account has logged into the forums is irrelevant when the entirety of the message is contained in the e-mail notification. We've been assured that account is being checked.

Fair enough, however, I would push them to at least log into that account so this issue doesn't come up again.....and it will come up again.

Yeah, I think there should be acknowledgement when you report a cheater; so that you know you aren't shouting into an empty void.

However, it's bad form for a games company and not really the players' business to know the results..............as long as you trust the company in their endeavours. That appears to be our problem right now.

"harvestmouse;c-2372180" wrote:
Yeah, I think there should be acknowledgement when you report a cheater; so that you know you aren't shouting into an empty void.

However, it's bad form for a games company and not really the players' business to know the results..............as long as you trust the company in their endeavours. That appears to be our problem right now.

The acknowledgement we should be getting is the lost rewards we didn't get from GAC, Arena, TW, etc., because of that cheater. If you lose a round in Kyber 1, you just lost 700 crystals. Cheaters are stealing from players. When they get caught and banned, every player in that GAC round should receive compensation for what they didn't get. The cheater's forfeit means everyone else moves up one spot in that round and if they faced the cheater and lost, they get the difference in crystals they didn't get.

They don't have to say, "this player cheated and this is how they did it." It could just be, "a player was caught cheating, here is compensation for what you should've gotten." (for the other SEVEN players in that group.)

"Ultra;c-2372178" wrote:

"DarjeloSalas;c-2372159" wrote:

"WookieWookie;c-2372145" wrote:

"crzydroid;c-2372099" wrote:
We've been assured that account is being checked.

We've been assured that the second half of the phase 1 gear changes are coming 'soon,' (TM) also 7 months ago. When someone ghosts you for 7 months, it raises the question of whether or not they're really 'working' on it. Probably would avoid complaints and a lot of threads if he just set a weekly alarm to check in on the forums, even if for just 5-10 minutes.

I admire the optimism!

The devs could give away 50 omicron mats tomorrow and someone on here would complain that it wasn’t 60.

They should be doing better with cheaters though. I think there should be a weekly “the following players got banned” post.

they said they wouldn't do that

They say a lot of things that are untrue, so theres that.....

"harvestmouse;c-2372180" wrote:
Yeah, I think there should be acknowledgement when you report a cheater; so that you know you aren't shouting into an empty void.

However, it's bad form for a games company and not really the players' business to know the results..............as long as you trust the company in their endeavours. That appears to be our problem right now.

The only reason, really, to not name those busted for cheating is the list is long and it would make them look bad to admit to so many cheaters.

License agreement would protect CG/EA/whoever from repercussions from naming the cheaters game names. If not, they have bad lawyers :)