Raid reward comparison based on data
I've done research of old raids data based on example I've founded. There is some rules of this research: CPit not included. Example to show what was lost for guilds who finished only HSTR. ...
Forum Discussion
Mostly you’re over sampling low frequency high value outcomes. You’re also including value from pieces that don’t actually have any value, or have very nominal value.
The minimum drop from marquee shard packs is 5, the maximum is 330. By the math you’re using the average drop is 167.5 shards. Pretty sure most people could tell you that’s not the actual average.
The minimum drop from marquee shard packs is 5, the maximum is 330. By the math you’re using the average drop is 167.5 shards. Pretty sure most people could tell you that’s not the actual average.
"DeusArt;c-2423602" wrote:"MaruMaru;c-2423600" wrote:
Since we don't calculate on the max you need to compare on average if you were to debunk that study...
I've already posted:
Min drop 48 gear parts - Max drop 200 gear parts. AVG 124 parts."Dawnsinger;c-2423599" wrote:
Fine, use the analysis by Danius on Reddit. His is excellent and dovetails with the actual data collected for weeks by TVF. Yours is about as good as someone using the 330 drops from marquee packs to prove why those are a better value than energy nodes.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SWGalaxyOfHeroes/comments/13d8hl1/updated_raid_reward_comparison_postchanges/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=2&utm_term=1
We already see TVF calcs here:
https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/263478/response-to-raid-economy-update/p10
Part of MK1 gear if caclulated as CCB and BW while it's part of MK1 gear economy. And as he said something was just ignored becouse it seems usless.
May I ask do you read my math? Do you understad it? Why (in numbers) it's not accurate? At least on one Rancor raid that attached to this post?
