"TVF;c-2428971" wrote:
"Lumiya;c-2428797" wrote:
"TVF;c-2428786" wrote:
"Lumiya;c-2428741" wrote:
"Starslayer;c-2428737" wrote:
"Lumiya;c-2428581" wrote:
"StarSon;c-2428577" wrote:
"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2428526" wrote:
Why do we care if one side gets way more engagement?
Because it then erodes both sides. You don't like 3v3? Well, good news, it's already optional. Just don't play it.
I wouldn't agree that it is optional because it is a source (for some even the main source) for crystals.
Not really a problem in the current system where players (except at the top of k1) tend to 50% win rate by design.
Of course it is a problem. If you don't play a full season, especially because the system is designed for 50%, you will not automatically win every battle in the next season. And on top of that you get less crystals because you get demoted if you don't participate/ just do the 10 point battle.
If you don't participate that's on you.
It was not me whom said "Just don't play it" and that it is "optional". My comment is a direct answer to that. ?
"Just don't play it" in this context means join, do one battle, and collect your second place rewards.
Yes and my answer before that was referring exactly to that. Just read it again please. With don't play I meant exactly that: Doing the 10 point battle or not playing at all which is right at the end of my comment.
"Of course it is a problem. If you don't play a full season, especially because the system is designed for 50%, you will not automatically win every battle in the next season. And on top of that you get less crystals because you get demoted if you don't participate/ just do the 10 point battle"