Forum Discussion
I disagree with Visas being Neutral. She very much sided with the light, and her motivations are very anti-dark side. Bounty Hunters as a faction could be considered neutral, but the individuals? No. Tuskens also make sense as dark side cause of their selfish ways and constant murder/torture of Tatooine's inhabitants. Just cause it's their planet originally, doesn't mean it's right or just. Wampa I agree with, Ewoks I can see the argument for since they only aligned with the rebels out of fear/respect. Jawas make sense as neutral. And I guess Ugnaught too. Droids have their own programmed personalities and motivations, so Idk who if any would be neutral. Most seem pretty accurate, and they aren't just mindless drones.
I agree with you, Tuskens value brute force and survival of the fittest, even though they are not "evil" they are having dark side philosophy. I think same goes with Ewoks but the opposite perspective they are peaceful creatures they dont value violence. Wampa, Jawas and Ugnaught should be the only ones neutral and maybe some bounty hunters like Embo and Old Boba Fett but i also have some doubts about touching bounty hunter synergy. Wampa and Jawa being neutral may hurt DV and Rey synergy but we dont use that synergy as we used to, also there is no storywise reason too. It has been a couple of years and we only have 1 neutral, it is time to get rid off neutral tag or adding Wampa and Jawas and locking their synergy as solo or only together.
Featured Places
SWGOH General Discussion
Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.Latest Activity: 20 hours agoCommunity Highlights
- CG_Meathead7 months ago
Capital Games Team