After losing another tie break, was thinking this could be improved now that crystals are tied to it. Rather than total roster GP, I thought it would make more sense to break the tie based on used/deployed GP in the round. That way either side at least has a chance to win the tie break. Whether it’s least GP used or most GP used in the round that decides the tie break feels like an improvement over what we have now.

"Justokay;c-2355473" wrote:I want least GP used. Current system is most GP which people seem to like. So I was throwing a bone to those people if they want to defend a most GP system. It doesn’t really matter. The point is whether there’s a better system. Do you have a suggestion?Leave it like it is.

"Justokay;d-255486" wrote:After losing another tie break, was thinking this could be improved now that crystals are tied to it. Rather than total roster GP, I thought it would make more sense to break the tie based on used/deployed GP in the round. That way either side at least has a chance to win the tie break. Whether it’s least GP used or most GP used in the round that decides the tie break feels like an improvement over what we have now. Easier improvement would be to just add 1 gp pt.

"Justokay;d-255486" wrote:After losing another tie break, was thinking this could be improved now that crystals are tied to it. Rather than total roster GP, I thought it would make more sense to break the tie based on used/deployed GP in the round. That way either side at least has a chance to win the tie break. Whether it’s least GP used or most GP used in the round that decides the tie break feels like an improvement over what we have now. In a battle where neither full cleared, then this would give the win to whoever could be bothered sending in the more teams to fail. End result could be the exact same as current system, where both players sit there using every toon in their roster to get the win. Same result for way more effort. Nah.

Tie break: Each player's ugnaught faces off in an AI controlled match up. The better little piggy takes the whole shebang!

Why would most GP used be the deciding factor?

Suggestion: GAC tiebreaker | EA Forums

CCyrilS
3 years ago
"Justokay;c-2355473" wrote:
I want least GP used. Current system is most GP which people seem to like. So I was throwing a bone to those people if they want to defend a most GP system. It doesn’t really matter. The point is whether there’s a better system. Do you have a suggestion?

Leave it like it is.
CCyrilS
3 years ago
"Justokay;d-255486" wrote:
After losing another tie break, was thinking this could be improved now that crystals are tied to it. Rather than total roster GP, I thought it would make more sense to break the tie based on used/deployed GP in the round. That way either side at least has a chance to win the tie break. Whether it’s least GP used or most GP used in the round that decides the tie break feels like an improvement over what we have now.

Easier improvement would be to just add 1 gp pt.
winterwolves
Rising Scout
3 years ago
"Justokay;d-255486" wrote:
After losing another tie break, was thinking this could be improved now that crystals are tied to it. Rather than total roster GP, I thought it would make more sense to break the tie based on used/deployed GP in the round. That way either side at least has a chance to win the tie break. Whether it’s least GP used or most GP used in the round that decides the tie break feels like an improvement over what we have now.

In a battle where neither full cleared, then this would give the win to whoever could be bothered sending in the more teams to fail. End result could be the exact same as current system, where both players sit there using every toon in their roster to get the win. Same result for way more effort. Nah.
harvestmouse1
Seasoned Novice
3 years ago
Tie break: Each player's ugnaught faces off in an AI controlled match up. The better little piggy takes the whole shebang!
tvsfrink
3 years ago
Why would most GP used be the deciding factor?
spash2010
3 years ago
Why not least gp used?
tvsfrink
3 years ago
You brought up most and I don't understand why.
spash2010
3 years ago
I want least GP used. Current system is most GP which people seem to like. So I was throwing a bone to those people if they want to defend a most GP system. It doesn’t really matter. The point is whether there’s a better system. Do you have a suggestion?
spash2010
3 years ago
Why give more points to undersized squads then? There is in-game precedent for recognizing something equivalent to less GP being skillful.
CCyrilS
3 years ago
"Justokay;c-2355476" wrote:
Why give more points to undersized squads then? There is in-game precedent for recognizing something equivalent to less GP being skillful.

Yeah, if you WIN with an undersized squad. Not tie/draw/timeout.