The 3 points that are soooo expensive x_x

I'm willing to bet you lost by 4 points not 3

"GegeGerard24;c-2400985" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2400984" wrote:
I'm willing to bet you lost by 4 points not 3

I am talking about the 845 and the 842 score.

The difference in the score is 3
So 3 points would have been a tie and the tie breaker is GP. So depending on your GP compared to your opponent you may have needed 4 points, not 3 points to win.

If your GP is lower than your opponent than you would have needed 4 points to win
If your GP is higher than your opponent than you would have needed 3 points to win

I can't remember how many GAC matches I won/lost by just one point difference. Banner pinching is quite common if you are facing efficiency players.

3 pt is actually a quite comfortable margin.

"dogwelder79;c-2401103" wrote:
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. That's life.

I guess life is much more exciting if you were able to steal the win from your opponent in GAC by 1 pt difference.

"KDC99X;c-2404234" wrote:

If I’m wrong, please explain why, I’m always open to learning more and improving my gameplay!

You’ll find some numbers there:
https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/254501/the-strategy-of-losing-in-gac/p1

And as the Very Wise @PeachyPeachSWGOH once said eloquently:
“ TLDR
you can always lose when you want to. Not true on the flip side.”

Basically: If you want to maximise your rewards, doing your best each round will do the trick.

"Starslayer;c-2404247" wrote:

"KDC99X;c-2404234" wrote:

If I’m wrong, please explain why, I’m always open to learning more and improving my gameplay!

You’ll find some numbers there:
https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/254501/the-strategy-of-losing-in-gac/p1

And as the Very Wise @PeachyPeachSWGOH once said eloquently:
“ TLDR
you can always lose when you want to. Not true on the flip side.”

Basically: If you want to maximise your rewards, doing your best each round will do the trick.

Nah, I was only quoting Confucius.

"Ultra;c-2400984" wrote:
I'm willing to bet you lost by 4 points not 3

I am talking about the 845 and the 842 score.

"GegeGerard24;c-2400985" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2400984" wrote:
I'm willing to bet you lost by 4 points not 3

I am talking about the 845 and the 842 score.

Talking about you have less GP than your opponent.

"GegeGerard24;c-2400985" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2400984" wrote:
I'm willing to bet you lost by 4 points not 3

I am talking about the 845 and the 842 score.

i know

"scuba;c-2401028" wrote:

The difference in the score is 3
So 3 points would have been a tie and the tie breaker is GP. So depending on your GP compared to your opponent you may have needed 4 points, not 3 points to win.

If your GP is lower than your opponent than you would have needed 4 points to win
If your GP is higher than your opponent than you would have needed 3 points to win

Thanks for the explanation. I didnt know it.

But, when i posted that pictures, i had nomore chance to fight him, as in i used up all my possible characters and his territories were all conquered.
I was very disappointed when i opened my tab and found that the guy beat me by only 3 points.
I could have been the #1....sigh....

I think, if i could keep 1 more character at "full protection", i could have won the GAC...