Fracture 9th Sister Taunts -- Feature or Bug?

"Ravens1113;c-2389952" wrote:

"Hal_10000;c-2389947" wrote:
Fracture's text says they can't gain buffs, though.

It’s a messed up order of operations kinda thing.

So when you fracture or even isolate someone that has that reapplication of taunt when dispelled it goes like this:

Fracture dispels the taunt. Then taunt is redone. Then fracture is put into place. It’s just how CG coded it.

So if you were then able to dispel that taunt again after fracture is in place that would work.

Actually the highlighted part is not correct. Fracture itself does not dispel anything. If you read Thrawn's special:

Deal Special damage to target enemy 4 times, dispel all buffs on them, remove 50% Turn Meter, and inflict Fracture

The dispelling takes place in a step separate from, and before, fracture is applied.

The general pattern CG seems to have established, though not explicitly stated AFAIK, is that all the events in reaction to an event (A) are always based on the state of the target toon as of A. For example, when you mass assist on somebody, and the first hit is a crit, it causes GK to gain taunt, but all the other hits during the same mass assist still hit the original target rather than GK, because as far as they are concerned, GK does not have taunt yet.

"PeachyPeachSWGOH;c-2389989" wrote:

"Ravens1113;c-2389952" wrote:

"Hal_10000;c-2389947" wrote:
Fracture's text says they can't gain buffs, though.

It’s a messed up order of operations kinda thing.

So when you fracture or even isolate someone that has that reapplication of taunt when dispelled it goes like this:

Fracture dispels the taunt. Then taunt is redone. Then fracture is put into place. It’s just how CG coded it.

So if you were then able to dispel that taunt again after fracture is in place that would work.

Actually the highlighted part is not correct. Fracture itself does not dispel anything. If you read Thrawn's special:

The move itself is also called "Fracture" and does dispel. It also inflicts the debuff, Fracture.

Based on the mechanics, it first dispels buff and then apply buff immunity effect. I guess between the dispel and the buff immunity application, Seventh Sister regained taunt.

Same with Isolate.

"PeachyPeachSWGOH;c-2389989" wrote:

"Ravens1113;c-2389952" wrote:

"Hal_10000;c-2389947" wrote:
Fracture's text says they can't gain buffs, though.

It’s a messed up order of operations kinda thing.

So when you fracture or even isolate someone that has that reapplication of taunt when dispelled it goes like this:

Fracture dispels the taunt. Then taunt is redone. Then fracture is put into place. It’s just how CG coded it.

So if you were then able to dispel that taunt again after fracture is in place that would work.

Actually the highlighted part is not correct. Fracture itself does not dispel anything. If you read Thrawn's special:

Deal Special damage to target enemy 4 times, dispel all buffs on them, remove 50% Turn Meter, and inflict Fracture

The dispelling takes place in a step separate from, and before, fracture is applied.

The general pattern CG seems to have established, though not explicitly stated AFAIK, is that all the events in reaction to an event (A) are always based on the state of the target toon as of A. For example, when you mass assist on somebody, and the first hit is a crit, it causes GK to gain taunt, but all the other hits during the same mass assist still hit the original target rather than GK, because as far as they are concerned, GK does not have taunt yet.

You're interpreting the text and the game your own way and expect everyone do it the same way, that's not right.

Also, comparating to a mass assist is totally wrong, as everyone is called to assist on the target first, so everyone starts their attack to the target before it gets hit.

And it totally fits the ability description. To work the other way around, the way you want, it should say that applies the debuff Fracture and THEN dispel all buffs, but that's not how it's worded.