Grand Arena matchmaking.
The matchmaking is ridiculous. Players with high squads farm rhe rewards against players that stand no chance at winning. Before y'all say anything about inactive players keep rhat to yourself. The p...
Forum Discussion
Something I always found odd. Half of the top 10 arena players(including fleet)are in carbonate in gac. Do they just forget how to play when they leave the arena
Oh and the top arena player is in carbonate 4 the same as me and I'm in the 800's in arena
So it's easy for me to see that these posts by people are accurate. Tomorrow I face my first galactic legend and a bunch of relic 7-9. My only chance at winning is if he's trying to get his rank even lower and not show.
There has been one truth since the first games that had pvp. People will look for any advantage they can find.
And when it comes down to it pay to win games have the worst player base.
Suggesting people would deliberately and repeatedly lose in GAC for a competitive advantage doesn’t stand up. The sliding scale of rewards, both daily and from winning rounds, means any player doing that deliberately is earning fewer crystals than if they fought competitively at “their level”.
Half of the top 10 arena players(including fleet)are in carbonate in gac. Do they just forget how to play when they leave the arena
Squad Arena is quite meaningless. After doing one a day, there's no real reason to spend a lot of time/effort here. Fleet Arena however, is quite different. I'd have thought that players wishing to do well here would also have an interest in GAC.
So it's easy for me to see that these posts by people are accurate.
Well..........I don't think it's possible that the OP's post 'very' accurate. The OP wrote:
Players with high squads farm rhe rewards against players that stand no chance at winning.
However, DarjeloSalas corrected that with:
Suggesting people would deliberately and repeatedly lose in GAC for a competitive advantage doesn’t stand up. The sliding scale of rewards, both daily and from winning rounds, means any player doing that deliberately is earning fewer crystals than if they fought competitively at “their level”.
So, that part isn't at all accurate.
The OP also wrote:
Before y'all say anything about inactive players keep rhat to yourself. The players are still active and walking all over us players that don't stand a chance
If the player is 'active' and 'competitive' they will climb, thus the situation being described wouldn't happen. If the rosters are as powerful as suggested, then they must be 'quite' inactive to stay at well..............you're suggesting Carbonite, but the OP gave a lack of useful information on which league/s.
Obviously there's no 2 players alike. Some are totally inactive or just 1 time attackers. Whereas others are dependent on time or motivation. I certainly think there are a lot of the lack of intestinal fortituders; those that won't even try if it's competitive, but happy to try when they know they can't lose.
However, the bottom line is if they're active 50% of the time in low Carbonite they will climb away from low Carbonite. So, the large accounts that are in low Carb have to be more inactive than active.
All this said, this is an issue that needs to be addressed. Not from a winning perspective, we all live in a win percentage window, but from a spirit of the game and a positive experience perspective.
Featured Places
