Game is dying.
Agreed. Maybe 4-5 people visit a day and there's no real reason to visit except for a measly few thousand dollars. No incentive.
Forum Discussion
Mjr1124 wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
Mjr1124 wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
Mjr1124 wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
VxMarmitex9 wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
amauthe8 wrote:
Hey Josh just a thought...
I've never seen you post anything positive. You always talk smack.
lol'd.
It's true. You do have your brief moments of helpfulness but you do dish it out a bit too much in all fairness.
Blame EA for not giving us an update in several weeks.
As an alleged attorney, you should know that this is not a defense.
As an attorney I also know that we're not in court and are not involved in a legal dispute.
You're the one who brought it up, as an alleged attorney you should know that once you do that it's fair game...
I brought it up in the context of a legal dispute (whether it's unlawful to read the raw data files). You brought it up in a discussion about whether I'm a jerk or not which has no connection to law.
I'm not disputing the fact that you're a jerk, that's obvious. What I do doubt is that you have any place in a courtroom unless they need the floors cleaned. Your barely cogent attempts to argue with laymen on the internet is evidence enough of that. I wasn't calling you a jerk at all anyway, again, I was doubting your claim to be an attorney, somehow that slipped right by your keen legal prowess. I'll let the record speak for itself, and go ahead and rest my case.
If this guy is a lawyer, than God help anyone he represents. He's got issues and acts like a 6 month old.gogators01uf wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
You posted the same exact picture in an effort to troll me in another topic earlier today. You lack creativity.
False, I posted the exact same picture to depict your behavior/attitude. I don't need creativity because you act like a faceless baby on an internet forum. This picture is sufficient.
Based on your post I'd say the picture is much more suited for you. So much bawwwing.JoshSherer wrote:
gogators01uf wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
You posted the same exact picture in an effort to troll me in another topic earlier today. You lack creativity.
False, I posted the exact same picture to depict your behavior/attitude. I don't need creativity because you act like a faceless baby on an internet forum. This picture is sufficient.
Based on your post I'd say the picture is much more suited for you. So much bawwwing.
Right. You can't take ownership over your own actions and attempt to blame others... wait, maybe you are a lawyer after all :lol: :lol: :lol: Whatever helps you sleep at night, Nancy-Boy.JoshSherer wrote:
gogators01uf wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
You posted the same exact picture in an effort to troll me in another topic earlier today. You lack creativity.
False, I posted the exact same picture to depict your behavior/attitude. I don't need creativity because you act like a faceless baby on an internet forum. This picture is sufficient.
Based on your post I'd say the picture is much more suited for you. So much bawwwing.
So counsellor, you object citing lack of creativity, and your counter argument is I know you are but what am I? Grisham should write a book about you!Mjr1124 wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
Mjr1124 wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
Mjr1124 wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
VxMarmitex9 wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
amauthe8 wrote:
Hey Josh just a thought...
I've never seen you post anything positive. You always talk smack.
lol'd.
It's true. You do have your brief moments of helpfulness but you do dish it out a bit too much in all fairness.
Blame EA for not giving us an update in several weeks.
As an alleged attorney, you should know that this is not a defense.
As an attorney I also know that we're not in court and are not involved in a legal dispute.
You're the one who brought it up, as an alleged attorney you should know that once you do that it's fair game...
I brought it up in the context of a legal dispute (whether it's unlawful to read the raw data files). You brought it up in a discussion about whether I'm a jerk or not which has no connection to law.
I'm not disputing the fact that you're a jerk, that's obvious. What I do doubt is that you have any place in a courtroom unless they need the floors cleaned. Your barely cogent attempts to argue with laymen on the internet is evidence enough of that. I wasn't calling you a jerk at all anyway, again, I was doubting your claim to be an attorney, somehow that slipped right by your keen legal prowess. I'll let the record speak for itself, and go ahead and rest my case.
No, you were saying that I dish things out too much. I blamed EA and you said that as an alleged attorney I should know that's not a defense. We were not discussing whether I was or was not an attorney. You stuck the word "alleged" in your post, but the central point was whether or not I dish things out and whether or not the law applies to my dishing things out. My "keen legal prowess" misinterpreted nothing. Your backpedaling and damage control is where this conversation went wrong. But while we're on the discussion of whether I'm an attorney, feel free to let me know what sort of proof you'd be satisfied with. If its not too much effort I'd be happy to post it.Mjr1124 wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
gogators01uf wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
You posted the same exact picture in an effort to troll me in another topic earlier today. You lack creativity.
False, I posted the exact same picture to depict your behavior/attitude. I don't need creativity because you act like a faceless baby on an internet forum. This picture is sufficient.
Based on your post I'd say the picture is much more suited for you. So much bawwwing.
So counsellor, you object citing lack of creativity, and your counter argument is I know you are but what am I? Grisham should write a book about you!
Mjr1124 wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
gogators01uf wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
You posted the same exact picture in an effort to troll me in another topic earlier today. You lack creativity.
False, I posted the exact same picture to depict your behavior/attitude. I don't need creativity because you act like a faceless baby on an internet forum. This picture is sufficient.
Based on your post I'd say the picture is much more suited for you. So much bawwwing.
So counsellor, you object citing lack of creativity, and your counter argument is I know you are but what am I? Grisham should write a book about you!
My responses match in style and in effort. He posted the same picture twice in a lazy and uncreative manner, so I gave an effortless response. You typed a lot more in your other post so I typed more too. Sorry if it doesn't meet your expectations.gogators01uf wrote:
Mjr1124 wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
gogators01uf wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
You posted the same exact picture in an effort to troll me in another topic earlier today. You lack creativity.
False, I posted the exact same picture to depict your behavior/attitude. I don't need creativity because you act like a faceless baby on an internet forum. This picture is sufficient.
Based on your post I'd say the picture is much more suited for you. So much bawwwing.
So counsellor, you object citing lack of creativity, and your counter argument is I know you are but what am I? Grisham should write a book about you!
Sure doesn't take much to get a laugh out of this guy, huh?JoshSherer wrote:
Mjr1124 wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
Mjr1124 wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
Mjr1124 wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
VxMarmitex9 wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
amauthe8 wrote:
Hey Josh just a thought...
I've never seen you post anything positive. You always talk smack.
lol'd.
It's true. You do have your brief moments of helpfulness but you do dish it out a bit too much in all fairness.
Blame EA for not giving us an update in several weeks.
As an alleged attorney, you should know that this is not a defense.
As an attorney I also know that we're not in court and are not involved in a legal dispute.
You're the one who brought it up, as an alleged attorney you should know that once you do that it's fair game...
I brought it up in the context of a legal dispute (whether it's unlawful to read the raw data files). You brought it up in a discussion about whether I'm a jerk or not which has no connection to law.
I'm not disputing the fact that you're a jerk, that's obvious. What I do doubt is that you have any place in a courtroom unless they need the floors cleaned. Your barely cogent attempts to argue with laymen on the internet is evidence enough of that. I wasn't calling you a jerk at all anyway, again, I was doubting your claim to be an attorney, somehow that slipped right by your keen legal prowess. I'll let the record speak for itself, and go ahead and rest my case.
No, you were saying that I dish things out too much. I blamed EA and you said that as an alleged attorney I should know that's not a defense. We were not discussing whether I was or was not an attorney. You stuck the word "alleged" in your post, but the central point was whether or not I dish things out and whether or not the law applies to my dishing things out. My "keen legal prowess" misinterpreted nothing. Your backpedaling and damage control is where this conversation went wrong. But while we're on the discussion of whether I'm an attorney, feel free to let me know what sort of proof you'd be satisfied with. If its not too much effort I'd be happy to post it.
I never said you dish anything out too much, that was someone else. I'm not gonna dig through the thread to find out who did, but you should get your facts straight. Oh wait I'm sure it's the paralegals fault. The entirety of my statement related only to the fact that you were blaming your being a jerk on EA not releasing an update. It's not EA's fault that you're a jerk, your mom probably didn't show you enough love as a child. Give her credit though, at least she lets you hang out in her basement, grow a killer neckbeard, and watch reruns of Law and Order all day long.JoshSherer wrote:
Mjr1124 wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
gogators01uf wrote:
JoshSherer wrote:
You posted the same exact picture in an effort to troll me in another topic earlier today. You lack creativity.
False, I posted the exact same picture to depict your behavior/attitude. I don't need creativity because you act like a faceless baby on an internet forum. This picture is sufficient.
Based on your post I'd say the picture is much more suited for you. So much bawwwing.
So counsellor, you object citing lack of creativity, and your counter argument is I know you are but what am I? Grisham should write a book about you!
My responses match in style and in effort. He posted the same picture twice in a lazy and uncreative manner, so I gave an effortless response. You typed a lot more in your other post so I typed more too. Sorry if it doesn't meet your expectations.
Wait, what makes you think any of your drivel deserved any more creativity than what you received? You really think you're that high and mighty? Look at your posts. You're acting like a baby and didn't deserve anything else besides the same lackluster crybaby picture. Honestly, you didn't deserve the time and effort in finding the same picture and reposting it here, but I threw you some pity. You're attempts in acting like some internet tough guy are weak.
