New(ish) Forum user / Forum Issues / Noob help

To OP: Josh was funny 6 months ago. Now his posts are the same thing over and over. Jumped the shark and predictable equals not funny.

Also, when preceding a word that begins with a vowel, "a" should be "an."

I tap tiles:

You have to leave at least one "hand shake" where your tile should be. I suggest leaving two because you will eventually accidentally tap on one too many. Leave those two "hands" as long as the game allows. For every 'hands" you tap on above those two, you get a tile saved in your "Inventory". You only pay for that first tile and let it mature for the time required for that one tile but you get multiple tiles. I collected over 200 tiles that way.

I started a new town plus my sister has one now. I'll send an invite for you. I'll tap tiles and hope you do also.

jraffa50 wrote:

fastdan1 wrote:

adidas4fun68 wrote:

jraffa50 wrote:

Come on now. So if I click on his post he's not really trolling me? I'm not sure why you are trying so hard to defend him against the notion of trolling. Under pretty much any basic, standard definition he is considered a troll. It may not be "exclusive", but you are working really hard to find the obscure random, made-up definition which would exclude him. He posts things to get a rise out of fellow posters. That's trolling. Whether you find it intriguing or interesting or a benefit to this forum is another thing. But his intention is to get people fired up. Just because you find it entertaining does not mean he's not trolling.

why are you clicking on his threads if you believe him to be a troll?

Why are you trying so hard to make sure noobs view him as a troll?

If some people find him entertaining then for those people he is not a troll, why do you find this so hard to accept?

How does labelling his behaviour as a troll help anyone?

Who's "trying so hard to make sure noobs view him as a troll"? The OP asked the question.

I could care less about his posts. I rarely read them. But the idea that he's not a troll, based on someone's personal definition, to me was silly and I responded to it. I can make up my own definitions to words too, but that doesn't help anyone. As I said, he may be entertaining and funny, but if his intention is to get people agitated, that's him being a troll.

so, in answer to my questions

1) no answer
2) no answer
3) no answer
4) no answer

Hmm, your post really advanced my understanding of your viewpoint. Not.

It would appear I have accidently started world war 3 over josh. Which is what he'd want, or not as the case is being argued.
Does this mean I'm a troll for provoking a reaction? :p

I would add a picture of homer eating popcorn but I have a feeling I possibly need to be promoted.

xTaityx wrote:
It would appear I have accidently started world war 3 over josh. Which is what he'd want, or not as the case is being argued.
Does this mean I'm a troll for provoking a reaction? :p

I would add a picture of homer eating popcorn but I have a feeling I possibly need to be promoted.

yes, no, surely you're an EA VP by now?!

adidas4fun68 wrote:

xTaityx wrote:
It would appear I have accidently started world war 3 over josh. Which is what he'd want, or not as the case is being argued.
Does this mean I'm a troll for provoking a reaction? :p

I would add a picture of homer eating popcorn but I have a feeling I possibly need to be promoted.

yes, no, surely you're an EA VP by now?!

Don't even think I belong to EA at the moment...

xTaityx wrote:

adidas4fun68 wrote:

xTaityx wrote:
It would appear I have accidently started world war 3 over josh. Which is what he'd want, or not as the case is being argued.
Does this mean I'm a troll for provoking a reaction? :p

I would add a picture of homer eating popcorn but I have a feeling I possibly need to be promoted.

yes, no, surely you're an EA VP by now?!

Don't even think I belong to EA at the moment...

dont worry, wont be long til you sold your soul to the company store