Forum Discussion
- Congrats on reaching Level 50, as a faithful player to reach this accomplishment we now grant you the ability to purchase....... MAGGIE SIMPSON for the low, low price of 500 donuts!
lyle_catcliffe wrote:
I can see it happening: non-premium, Level 50. Comes with Ayn Rand School for Tots. Gerald premium at 90 donuts. New premium skin for Butterfats
http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080906071734/simpsons/images/9/92/Simpsons_03x15_-_Homer_Alone_rl-dvd_101_0001.jpg
Maybe.
That's what I was thinking, except the skin of course. But surely we would have to get her but you would think we would have gotten her by now. I think it's do able, and like mentioned earlier, yes she is small and I think it would have been nightmare before the character locator was implemented, but with the character finder, it's a piece of cake, you'll find her no worries. See it could be a make or break in the sense if they make her premium or not. If she is premium I certainly agree, she would be dear as hell. This would distroy long term freemium players or players who have only injected a small ammount of funds as everyone is dying for maggie, well most are. Ill admit iam a loyal freemium player. I have out some money in the game in the past when the scratchers were actually win able but haven't put anymore in since then, but for maggie, I might just have to concider forking some out if she so happens to be released at all and if she is a premium, but it would have to be a "realistic" price and that's something I hope they concider.thatdonald845 wrote:
We already have her. She is tiny so I don't think that any new tasks/skins would be all that entertaining. A Krustyland style spin-off area set INSIDE the Simpson's house for Maggie to play games in would be better than having her sucking blankets on the lawn and crawling along the edge of the road like an insect.
Can see Jub Jub pretty easily.- First off I should say I would love to have Maggie in my game. I was thinking that maybe the reason ea haven't put her in the game is because she's a baby? ANd either a lot of Her tasks would have to be indoor tasks or joint tasks with other characters which people might find frustrating? Or maybe they're worried about people calling them irresponsible for having a baby crawling around unsupervised all round town? :) it's a silly thing to worry about but stranger things have happened!!
- Maggie as character and one of the jobs where she shoots burns :twisted: :wink:
Sleeping_Sun05 wrote:
First off I should say I would love to have Maggie in my game. I was thinking that maybe the reason ea haven't put her in the game is because she's a baby? ANd either a lot of Her tasks would have to be indoor tasks or joint tasks with other characters which people might find frustrating? Or maybe they're worried about people calling them irresponsible for having a baby crawling around unsupervised all round town? :) it's a silly thing to worry about but stranger things have happened!!
I think her and "limited" tasks wouldn't be the reason, we have characters that walk around aimlessly and do nothing. So I doubt that's the reason, I personally think its to keep people hanging on with the possibility if getting her. She falls into that "must have" category just like Bartman. There is an ulterior motive here with these two IMHO.- The Simpson family wouldn't be complete without her. I hope they do add her in one day.
emmcee1 wrote:
Sleeping_Sun05 wrote:
First off I should say I would love to have Maggie in my game. I was thinking that maybe the reason ea haven't put her in the game is because she's a baby? ANd either a lot of Her tasks would have to be indoor tasks or joint tasks with other characters which people might find frustrating? Or maybe they're worried about people calling them irresponsible for having a baby crawling around unsupervised all round town? :) it's a silly thing to worry about but stranger things have happened!!
I think her and "limited" tasks wouldn't be the reason, we have characters that walk around aimlessly and do nothing. So I doubt that's the reason, I personally think its to keep people hanging on with the possibility if getting her. She falls into that "must have" category just like Bartman. There is an ulterior motive here with these two IMHO.
I agree with both these points, I was thinking the same thing about limited tasks, and I thought somebody would bring up the amount of NPCs walking around, but that is another problem, we're always complaining about the amount of NPCs walking around.
Edit: I just want it on record I'd love Maggie, it's been mentioned already, its a Simpson's game, and the only members of the family we don't have are Maggie, * and Herb. That ain't right!! But I don't want her just for the sake of it, I want her inclusion (as well as * and Herb's) to mean something.
Edit 2: The * represents Homer's Mother. Some reason it's getting censored...- Maggie has gotten up to plenty of potential tasks in the show. I see no reason for her tasks to all be indoors.
neuroheart wrote:
Maggie has gotten up to plenty of potential tasks in the show. I see no reason for her tasks to all be indoors.
I would love to see one of her Halloween tasks as to make all other Springfielders turn into pacifiers with their heads.
About The Simpsons Tapped Out General Discussion
Talk about your The Simpsons: Tapped Out experience with other TSTO players.
49,406 PostsLatest Activity: 3 hours agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 5 hours ago
- 24 hours ago
- 2 days ago
Taps part 1,2 and 3
Solved7 days ago