kOeGy wrote: »
btw waylord, are you imperiumnod?
XCrossover70 wrote: »
I do understand that you have to defend your position - and I don't need to push it any further - everything is evidential already.
If you do prefer not to have any more meetings - we will understand that - but maybe - considering that world champ is happening soon and that guys who do represent a lot of other guys, and we do represent a lot more guys, then with whom you were speaking previously during those 4 meetings - would like to politely have an opportunity to tell our side of the story - you not opened to it?
gamerdruid wrote: »
Unrealistic suggestions of 40 meetings... hmmm 4 meetings in 6 years are regular meetings..... hmmm
ToXXXic69 wrote: »
> @sentierorosso said:
> Cross no way.....he already reply you with making fun of us, did not you notice? "But should they then have meetings in Russian, French, Punjabi or English. What about Gaelic? "
This was not making fun of you. The comment means that having meetings will not solve the problem of perception of fairness, because in the same way as you think it was unfair that a developer participated verbally with one group, there will always be those who will feel left out when developers speak to any group as the do not speak a language of a meeting.
It is the rest of us here that find humor in what you say because you keep trying to twist things to create guilt trips and appeal to a presumed insecurity of the developers in their character to reinstate your multi account gameplay. Since you have no case to revert the patch, and you can't play without multis, it is understandable that in your desperation you resort to such tactics. But it is really hilarious.
The bottom line is that the developers will read the comments here about teamplay being a problem. Teamplay is definitely not solely your concern. I also feel there should be a fix to the teamplay issue caused by the loss of resources of bases. It seems to me there is consensus on the subject among the players who have spoken on both sides (pro-multi acct and pro-single account gameplay).
EE_Elephterion wrote: »
but by that standard i'd also have to close my DMs here and ingame and disclose any report players make to me in private.
ToXXXic69 wrote: »
@sentierorosso my thoughts on your comments:
"Who are you in the game?" --- Does it matter? I am a player who feels that bringing a motorcycle to a bicycle race shows a lack of character. Multi-account gameplay is for players who can't play.
"The developers are wrong" --- No, you are wrong. Developers in all companies around the world need to find information about their target market in order to improve their product offering. The best way to do it is to speak with experienced customers and ask them directly.
"now nobody trusts anymore" --- You continue attempting to manipulate developers to reverse the anti-multi-account patch using guilt and ideas with no game-related substance.
"I can play without alt, I already did and I won (6 and 32)." --- Prove it. Show up at WCS with your team and teach everyone how the game is played.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!