Thank you @EE_Elephterion
For english: billion is 1,000,000,000.00
For spanish: billion is 1,000,000,000,000.00
And for German ????
Only curiosity. O:-)
1.000.000.000.000 just like in spanish. However, i think keeping the decimal acronyms consistent through every language will avoid confusion in the communication.
Thank you @EE_Elephterion
For english: billion is 1,000,000,000.00
For spanish: billion is 1,000,000,000,000.00
And for German ????
Only curiosity. O:-)
1.000.000.000.000 just like in spanish. However, i think keeping the decimal acronyms consistent through every language will avoid confusion in the communication.
Big thank you !
En español nosotros intercambiamos los símbolos: 1.000.000.000.000,00
In Spanish we exchange the symbols: 1,000,000,000,000.00
Not a part of EA / Envision teams - My comments are only mine.
An old bug on the new feature where it now shows who is in attack preparation , well as far as i know always and still now it will show some one in attack prep even if they are not able to look at the base or camp as like it is not in range. all anyone has to do is click the camp to highlight it. It can be anywhere and it would show someone in attack prep . like i said it is an old bug. it would do it back when other alliances would also show and before this new feature and still now. sorry for slacking, and reporting it so late.
An old bug on the new feature where it now shows who is in attack preparation , well as far as i know always and still now it will show some one in attack prep even if they are not able to look at the base or camp as like it is not in range. all anyone has to do is click the camp to highlight it. It can be anywhere and it would show someone in attack prep . like i said it is an old bug. it would do it back when other alliances would also show and before this new feature and still now. sorry for slacking, and reporting it so late.
Thanks for the update still.
Would this be worth fixing or is it rather a feature now with the changes to how attack preparation is displaying spectating players?
Thanks for the update still.
Would this be worth fixing or is it rather a feature now with the changes to how attack preparation is displaying spectating players?
If I am going to attack a camp, base or outpost and another player from another alliance was already planning his attack, I think it is good to know that he was there before to give him the objective out of courtesy.
Post edited by nefrontheone on
Not a part of EA / Envision teams - My comments are only mine.
yea the only negative i can think of is if guys are farming in a group, at the same time then u open camp to sim and you see a spectator stop and move on to the next
never mind that happens in range or not
An old bug on the new feature where it now shows who is in attack preparation , well as far as i know always and still now it will show some one in attack prep even if they are not able to look at the base or camp as like it is not in range. all anyone has to do is click the camp to highlight it. It can be anywhere and it would show someone in attack prep . like i said it is an old bug. it would do it back when other alliances would also show and before this new feature and still now. sorry for slacking, and reporting it so late.
Thanks for the update still.
Would this be worth fixing or is it rather a feature now with the changes to how attack preparation is displaying spectating players?
Why do you see it as a mistake?
If I am going to attack a camp, base or outpost and another player from another alliance was already planning his attack, I think it is good to know that he was there before to give him the objective out of courtesy.
i liked when you could see when a different alliance was in attack prep especially if i was already attacking or if it was a base to gain poi influence or similar
Thanks for the update still.
Would this be worth fixing or is it rather a feature now with the changes to how attack preparation is displaying spectating players?
If I am going to attack a camp, base or outpost and another player from another alliance was already planning his attack, I think it is good to know that he was there before to give him the objective out of courtesy.
Well, this was more of an open question for here to discuss. I personally don't see it as a bug.
IT is not really now i think about it. just when i first noticed it thinking it says someone in prep there simming when they could not that it must be broke
Replies
When we have gathered a quantity of resources, acronyms are used to identify the quantity thousands (K), millions (M) ...
[... moved...]
Or do I directly put the request in the forum of suggestions for the future?
Thank you very much once again.
This would however only make it into 20.4 if we decide to include it.
For english: billion is 1,000,000,000.00
For spanish: billion is 1,000,000,000,000.00
And for German ????
Only curiosity. O:-)
1.000.000.000.000 just like in spanish. However, i think keeping the decimal acronyms consistent through every language will avoid confusion in the communication.
Big thank you !
En español nosotros intercambiamos los símbolos: 1.000.000.000.000,00
In Spanish we exchange the symbols: 1,000,000,000,000.00
Not quite!
American English 1 billion is 10^9 ie 1 000 000 000
British English 1 billion is 10^12 ie 1 000 000 000 000
Our American cousins short change us!
In other words, you just surprised me, gamerdruid. 8-O
Thanks for the update still.
Would this be worth fixing or is it rather a feature now with the changes to how attack preparation is displaying spectating players?
@EE_Elephterion Why do you see it as a mistake to fix?
If I am going to attack a camp, base or outpost and another player from another alliance was already planning his attack, I think it is good to know that he was there before to give him the objective out of courtesy.
never mind that happens in range or not
i liked when you could see when a different alliance was in attack prep especially if i was already attacking or if it was a base to gain poi influence or similar
Well, this was more of an open question for here to discuss. I personally don't see it as a bug.