EA Forums - Banner

VagabondWatchman Member


Last Active


  • I agree with Druid-To the victor goes the spoils. Instead of punishing victors, howabout finding a way to defeat them. If an alliance wins the server, they can control it as long as they are able imo. THAT, to me, seems fair.
  • I like the current format. It is challenging. Although it can be frustrating when you pick the wrong alliance and end up locked out of the middle. However, a confederation of alliances can overpower a controlling alliance if they really want to fight for it. But to just throw your hands up and cry about the winners is not…
  • I witnessed the whole farming issue on W92 . However, there is surely another way to fix the problem. Like the Diminishing return rule. If same alliance kills same base within 7 days, use a diminishing return along the lines of 1st-100%, 2nd-75%, 3rd-50% 4th-25%. Any other kills after 4th yields 0% within 7days of LAST…
  • That last line in my post should have read: I have no incentive to play on a new server because I don't want to be punished for PvP.
  • I am all for the King of the Hill format: To the victors go the spoils." Just as in life, there are winners and losers. If you are on the losing side of a server war because you failed to win; deal with it and move on to the next server in the hopes that you can do better if it bothers you so much. Now, I would like to…
  • I really wish that we could score RP for PvP. It has become somewhat counter productive to attack other players now.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.


First AnniversarySecond AnniversaryThird AnniversaryPhotogenicFirst Comment