Ranked versus, please one point minimum
I know , winning against someone really low should not give a lot of point..
but every game should at last give one point.. i just win against a 247 and i got 0 points for the win..
i can accept to get only 1 points, but 0 is like lost time..
so i wish there was a minimum of 1 point earn when we win.
but every game should at last give one point.. i just win against a 247 and i got 0 points for the win..
i can accept to get only 1 points, but 0 is like lost time..
so i wish there was a minimum of 1 point earn when we win.
0
Howdy, Stranger!
Replies
but the last 2minutes the oponnent clearly put down the gamepad and did not play. I earned -8 points.Logic ha:-) oh well life goes on.
you can down if you win?
i disagree.. it would be boring if it was only about the number of win... i find the system pretty well made..
i just believe you should always get a reward when you win , getting 0 points for a win is boring.
It's also a deterrent for scrub bashing. If an opponent is way too low for you, back out.
How can one tell when one should back out? I am top 100 in threes (goal limit) and I mostly get 1-2 points.
I have also received 0 for winning, I won that game very quickly. I have noticed I get more points if I drag the game out, doesn’t matter if opponent scores.