a_Bas3_CaMp3r wrote: »
Its in your head. I'm 86-4 in leaderboards and one of those was a disconnect verse a substantially weaker player. One loss was deserved against FlashDavin (probably the best hut player in the world)... Another was against a top leaderboard guy who played an exceptionally good trap once he got the 1-0 lead and deservedly beat me 3-2. My other loss I believe was a bit iffy. But thats 90 games played and only 1 iffy loss.
I roll an all hero / wcoh team. (WCOH Bure, WCOH Tarasenko, WCOH Cujo)
WealthyFriends wrote: »
The guys who have dominant records use exploits to win. It's how you overcome the balancing. That's why they are exploits.
It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
My lineup consists of..
Neely-92 DC Malhotra-Gaudreau
Rinne in net
Due to this, I don't know what to think.. I've had awful long with bad goals, but not to the extent of losing. 1 guy took me into OT with Frolik as his best player and he had Dan Girardi playing LW for God's sake. And it was because Michael Hutchinson thought he'd do his best Patrick Roy impression and 1 really stupid goal by him. I ended up scoring a goal with 0.6 left in OT, but I've been thinking about the supposed ice tilt that exists.
I'm still undecided on the matter. I've had so many awful goals scored on me because of horrible goaltending or atrocious bounces.. but I'm still 19-0-0 regardless of this. It's a weird situation that I don't know about.
And your the reason HUT sucks. Stop playing into th EA cash grab.
Not a good reason for exploits.
Weird **** will always happen. That's hockey. Hockey's a turrible sport to bet on because of this. Check the odds.
But with knowledge comes understanding. With understanding comes experience.