Why even respond to that guy ? People love to talk a big game on these boards. They prob are average at best so credibility goes right out the window.
I would love to play this goof @Workin_OT and mop the floor with him . I would laugh as I expose him and would make sure I beat and undress him so bad he NEVER talks about Defence.
I'm cool with everyone having an opinion , but you better back up what you say when you come off as if youre so good.
Never once said anything about being good and I don't need to justify myself to some random internet nerds.
My whole point in this thread is about being accountable and taking responsibility for your own mistakes and not taking the easy way out and blaming the game.
COGS was controlling his defenseman. He was the one who got too close, pushed the poke button too late.. Not the game.
If he pushed stick lift instead of poke check, he might have made a successful play. Is it the game's fault he didn't push A, and instead pushed RB too late? Nope.
Now go make another account and continue to seek internet validation from random nerds you insecure AllAmericanClown, eh bud?
Exactly. Youre not. So excuse yourself from criticizing cogs .
Done. Bye.
Neither are you, kid.
I don't particularly "like" Frothing_OT, but he's right in this at least that it was a terrible defensive play by COGs: he tried to make a grand slam play and he got burned. As the last man back, you should know you have to play that conservatively, not try to be a Hero. There's no sense in trying to defend him. Just hang your head in shame and move on.
Of course they are . one person admittedly sucks and the other person sucks jist behind the scenes .
They cant comprehend valid critiscms coming from me or other users arent becuase we arent lacking skill, rather the game mechanic is ****. Its not where it needs to be .
Even still those two monkeys are clowns who are scared of getting exposed for their true lack of skill becuase it will mean they cant come into threads offering any sort of advice or tips when they are garbo lol
Of course they are . one person admittedly **** and the other person **** jist behind the scenes .
They cant comprehend valid critiscms coming from me or other users arent becuase we arent lacking skill, rather the game mechanic is ****. Its not where it needs to be .
Even still those two monkeys are clowns who are scared of getting exposed for their true lack of skill becuase it will mean they cant come into threads offering any sort of advice or tips when they are garbo lol
That a challenge ? You said I'm not good right right?
Want to play a game of online vs. Or drop in ? You can pick wing, I'll pick either D
Lets see what your excuse is.
If you don't accept , then youre in the same boat at workin ot, which is useless
LOL! First take the training wheels off and learn how to play 6s. After that, anytime you need a shutdown d-man, you let me know. Be glad to show you how it's done, Buttercup.
No, I got the point: the poke check whiffed. The point you're not understanding is that you should've anticipated things might not go according to plan and at least stay in position. You are the LAST MAN BACK. No one should be able to get around you one on one. That's your job as the LAST MAN BACK.
But you didn't do your job. Your poke check whiffed at the same time you moved to the side so you could grab a lose puck when it came off the opponent's stick. It didn't. He got around you and scored. It's no sense crying about "the game made my poke check whiff" when you went completely out of position as well...
Next time help your cause and stay in position. Poke check whiffs, but you're still there to contain the play. Learn. Adapt. Become better.
You kidding? I was playing 6's on a daily basis when 6's ACTUALLY MATTERED IN NHL 11
Where were you then ? Nowhere to be found. Its a strong consensus among the HARDCORE 6s community that NHL11 was the last great game where you could find a VARIETY Of 6's matches all the time . the talent pool was EXTREMELY DEEP.
To argue this exposes yourself.
What do we see now ? Now we see fake 6's teams becuase most of the LEGIT teams dont play anymore BECUASE most of the LEGIT 6's member know this game simply ain't worth the time to play 6's CONSISTENTLY.
Lol. Poor kid . you're a big fish in a small pond. And you say play 6's like it means something nowadays! Ahhahaaha
You kidding? I was playing 6's on a daily basis when 6's ACTUALLY MATTERED IN NHL 11
Where were you then ? Nowhere to be found. Its a strong consensus among the HARDCORE 6s community that NHL11 was the last great game where you could find a VARIETY Of 6's matches all the time . the talent pool was EXTREMELY DEEP.
To argue this exposes yourself.
What do we see now ? Now we see fake 6's teams becuase most of the LEGIT teams dont play anymore BECUASE most of the LEGIT 6's member know this game simply ain't worth the time to play 6's CONSISTENTLY.
Lol. Poor kid . you're a big fish in a small pond. And you say play 6's like it means something nowadays! Ahhahaaha
yomomma the type of guy who brags about winning after glide bubbling in the corners until the other team gets tired of his **** and quits.
And Venom seriously, this post was obviously not about making the right play but about the bad mechanics so why are you going on about learning to play better... It's ridiculous how some people seem to think you should just tolerate the bad physics in the game and play around them.
To me the poke misses the puck from the video. Yes it does hit the stick but it doesn't hit the puck. We know the stick doesn't work for the most part stick on stick except majorly on stick lifts.
Me personally even if the guy is hustling fast I'd just let him come into my zone and let him lose the puck in my body when the gap closes or hope that my team back checks at least forcing his hand a bit more.
So yes if we had awesome stick on stick contact it would have been a great play but we don't and many of us know this and it shouldn't be a shocker.
I'm still waiting for the day we have pressure controls for things like hitting, poke checks, chops, and more.
yomomma the type of guy who brags about winning after glide bubbling in the corners until the other team gets tired of his **** and quits.
And Venom seriously, this post was obviously not about making the right play but about the bad mechanics so why are you going on about learning to play better... It's ridiculous how some people seem to think you should just tolerate the bad physics in the game and play around them.
You shouldn't, but in this case he made the wrong play. He tried to poke and move to the side while doing so because he thought the puck would come off the attacker's stick and he was going to be the Hero that made the turnover play.
This has nothing to do with physics though, because the poke missed the puck. Could the poke have knocked the attacker's stick away? Probably, but since COGs was moving away, the likely outcome is that the attacker would've regained control of the loose puck immediately (which would've continued in its original trajectory) and scored anyways.
yomomma the type of guy who brags about winning after glide bubbling in the corners until the other team gets tired of his **** and quits.
And Venom seriously, this post was obviously not about making the right play but about the bad mechanics so why are you going on about learning to play better... It's ridiculous how some people seem to think you should just tolerate the bad physics in the game and play around them.
You shouldn't, but in this case he made the wrong play. He tried to poke and move to the side while doing so because he thought the puck would come off the attacker's stick and he was going to be the Hero that made the turnover play.
This has nothing to do with physics though, because the poke missed the puck. Could the poke have knocked the attacker's stick away? Probably, but since COGs was moving away, the likely outcome is that the attacker would've regained control of the loose puck immediately (which would've continued in its original trajectory) and scored anyways.
Right. I don't understand why people keep missing that. He DID NOT land the poke check!
Say bad mechanics all you want but the fact remains... his stick never made contact with the puck.
yomomma the type of guy who brags about winning after glide bubbling in the corners until the other team gets tired of his **** and quits.
And Venom seriously, this post was obviously not about making the right play but about the bad mechanics so why are you going on about learning to play better... It's ridiculous how some people seem to think you should just tolerate the bad physics in the game and play around them.
You shouldn't, but in this case he made the wrong play. He tried to poke and move to the side while doing so because he thought the puck would come off the attacker's stick and he was going to be the Hero that made the turnover play.
This has nothing to do with physics though, because the poke missed the puck. Could the poke have knocked the attacker's stick away? Probably, but since COGs was moving away, the likely outcome is that the attacker would've regained control of the loose puck immediately (which would've continued in its original trajectory) and scored anyways.
Alright my bad, it didn't hit the puck.
I wish we had stick on stick collisions on at least for poke checks though. If nothing else these kind of situations would look a bit better.
This has nothing to do with physics though, because the poke missed the puck. Could the poke have knocked the attacker's stick away? Probably, but since COGs was moving away, the likely outcome is that the attacker would've regained control of the loose puck immediately (which would've continued in its original trajectory) and scored anyways.
Alright my bad, it didn't hit the puck.
I wish we had stick on stick collisions on at least for poke checks though. If nothing else these kind of situations would look a bit better.
We do have stick-on-stick collisions in this game, though. According to the sliders that govern online play in NHL 17, stick-on-stick collisions are supposed to knock the puck loose 100% of the time. The problem is that they don't knock the puck loose 100% of the time. Some times they knock the puck loose, and other times they have no effect at all. That's the real issue here: the total unreliability of the game's physics, which is why I do not understand why @venom2099 is defending the game in this case.
And yes, even if the stick-on-stick collision had knocked the puck loose, it's more than possible that the offensive player would have been able to pick up the puck and continue on his way. But it didn't knock the puck loose -- instead the offensive player just skated through COGS' stick as if it were a hologram. That's indefensible, and it's absolutely something people should be complaining about.
@Bmh245 it is something I've complained about. A lot. You know this.
In this case the stick on stick collision should've knocked the attacker's stick back, but the outcome would've been the same because COGs moved completely out of the way. If he doesn't like it, he can just remember that when I posted a similar video of a goal being scored on the "cross-grain cheese" when the game had just come out, HE himself marched into my thread and proclaimed that the goal was scored because I moved out of position, when it was the game that pushed me out (as everybody knows now).
Replies
My whole point in this thread is about being accountable and taking responsibility for your own mistakes and not taking the easy way out and blaming the game.
COGS was controlling his defenseman. He was the one who got too close, pushed the poke button too late.. Not the game.
If he pushed stick lift instead of poke check, he might have made a successful play. Is it the game's fault he didn't push A, and instead pushed RB too late? Nope.
Now go make another account and continue to seek internet validation from random nerds you insecure AllAmericanClown, eh bud?
Exactly. Youre not. So excuse yourself from criticizing cogs .
Done. Bye.
Neither are you, kid.
I don't particularly "like" Frothing_OT, but he's right in this at least that it was a terrible defensive play by COGs: he tried to make a grand slam play and he got burned. As the last man back, you should know you have to play that conservatively, not try to be a Hero. There's no sense in trying to defend him. Just hang your head in shame and move on.
Game. Set. Match...
That a challenge ? You said I'm not good right right?
Want to play a game of online vs. Or drop in ? You can pick wing, I'll pick either D
Lets see what your excuse is.
If you don't accept , then youre in the same boat at workin ot, which is useless
Of course they are . one person admittedly sucks and the other person sucks jist behind the scenes .
They cant comprehend valid critiscms coming from me or other users arent becuase we arent lacking skill, rather the game mechanic is ****. Its not where it needs to be .
Even still those two monkeys are clowns who are scared of getting exposed for their true lack of skill becuase it will mean they cant come into threads offering any sort of advice or tips when they are garbo lol
Haha! What a **** @sshat.
LOL! First take the training wheels off and learn how to play 6s. After that, anytime you need a shutdown d-man, you let me know. Be glad to show you how it's done, Buttercup.
No, I got the point: the poke check whiffed. The point you're not understanding is that you should've anticipated things might not go according to plan and at least stay in position. You are the LAST MAN BACK. No one should be able to get around you one on one. That's your job as the LAST MAN BACK.
But you didn't do your job. Your poke check whiffed at the same time you moved to the side so you could grab a lose puck when it came off the opponent's stick. It didn't. He got around you and scored. It's no sense crying about "the game made my poke check whiff" when you went completely out of position as well...
Next time help your cause and stay in position. Poke check whiffs, but you're still there to contain the play. Learn. Adapt. Become better.
You kidding? I was playing 6's on a daily basis when 6's ACTUALLY MATTERED IN NHL 11
Where were you then ? Nowhere to be found. Its a strong consensus among the HARDCORE 6s community that NHL11 was the last great game where you could find a VARIETY Of 6's matches all the time . the talent pool was EXTREMELY DEEP.
To argue this exposes yourself.
What do we see now ? Now we see fake 6's teams becuase most of the LEGIT teams dont play anymore BECUASE most of the LEGIT 6's member know this game simply ain't worth the time to play 6's CONSISTENTLY.
Lol. Poor kid . you're a big fish in a small pond. And you say play 6's like it means something nowadays! Ahhahaaha
Soooooooooooooooo....
And Venom seriously, this post was obviously not about making the right play but about the bad mechanics so why are you going on about learning to play better... It's ridiculous how some people seem to think you should just tolerate the bad physics in the game and play around them.
Me personally even if the guy is hustling fast I'd just let him come into my zone and let him lose the puck in my body when the gap closes or hope that my team back checks at least forcing his hand a bit more.
So yes if we had awesome stick on stick contact it would have been a great play but we don't and many of us know this and it shouldn't be a shocker.
I'm still waiting for the day we have pressure controls for things like hitting, poke checks, chops, and more.
You shouldn't, but in this case he made the wrong play. He tried to poke and move to the side while doing so because he thought the puck would come off the attacker's stick and he was going to be the Hero that made the turnover play.
This has nothing to do with physics though, because the poke missed the puck. Could the poke have knocked the attacker's stick away? Probably, but since COGs was moving away, the likely outcome is that the attacker would've regained control of the loose puck immediately (which would've continued in its original trajectory) and scored anyways.
Right. I don't understand why people keep missing that. He DID NOT land the poke check!
Say bad mechanics all you want but the fact remains... his stick never made contact with the puck.
Alright my bad, it didn't hit the puck.
I wish we had stick on stick collisions on at least for poke checks though. If nothing else these kind of situations would look a bit better.
We do have stick-on-stick collisions in this game, though. According to the sliders that govern online play in NHL 17, stick-on-stick collisions are supposed to knock the puck loose 100% of the time. The problem is that they don't knock the puck loose 100% of the time. Some times they knock the puck loose, and other times they have no effect at all. That's the real issue here: the total unreliability of the game's physics, which is why I do not understand why @venom2099 is defending the game in this case.
And yes, even if the stick-on-stick collision had knocked the puck loose, it's more than possible that the offensive player would have been able to pick up the puck and continue on his way. But it didn't knock the puck loose -- instead the offensive player just skated through COGS' stick as if it were a hologram. That's indefensible, and it's absolutely something people should be complaining about.
In this case the stick on stick collision should've knocked the attacker's stick back, but the outcome would've been the same because COGs moved completely out of the way. If he doesn't like it, he can just remember that when I posted a similar video of a goal being scored on the "cross-grain cheese" when the game had just come out, HE himself marched into my thread and proclaimed that the goal was scored because I moved out of position, when it was the game that pushed me out (as everybody knows now).
Turnabout, I'm told, is fair play...
I see some are blind