EA Forums - Banner

The beginning of the ratman and a few questions

Replies

  • JoshSherer
    1641 posts Member
    edited March 2014
    dave3490 wrote:
    JoshSherer wrote:
    drosax1 wrote:
    So Josh should we be expecting a post from you regarding the update?

    Which update? Wasn't the last one the 5 donut nonsense that I found insulting?

    They just put out one today, with guiney pigs apparently, i'm eagerly awaiting your post about it... disappointed we haven't seen one yet, i need my fix of Josh's complaints, you never, know, i think i'm now a fan of your work, i might actually agree with you :lol:

    I see. Give me time to get through the questline. Maybe I'll rush it after work. I have to see the pet and building we get before I can give a complete evaluation.
  • dave3490
    2472 posts
    edited March 2014
    JoshSherer wrote:
    dave3490 wrote:
    JoshSherer wrote:
    drosax1 wrote:
    So Josh should we be expecting a post from you regarding the update?

    Which update? Wasn't the last one the 5 donut nonsense that I found insulting?

    They just put out one today, with guiney pigs apparently, i'm eagerly awaiting your post about it... disappointed we haven't seen one yet, i need my fix of Josh's complaints, you never, know, i think i'm now a fan of your work, i might actually agree with you :lol:

    I see. Give me time to get through the questline. Maybe I'll rush it after work. I have to see the pet and building we get before I can give a complete evaluation.

    Looking forward to what you think of the update, will be good reading material as always ;)
  • JoshSherer
    1641 posts Member
    edited March 2014
    Bravewall wrote:
    JoshSherer wrote:
    Ratman5674 wrote:
    JoshSherer wrote:
    I'm not your enemy. I wouldn't waste my time (other than the two posts I wrote) on a 14 year old who is abusing a gimmick that wasn't even funny when it was first created 15 years ago.

    Actually, I don't really waste my time on most topics other than my own. You should feel honored just to have my presence here and to see me make 2 posts in your terrible topic. And believe me, I wouldn't be here if not for EA taking months to give us a freaking level update.

    Ratman is sorry







    He's not really

    3 posts now not 2

    Ratman can count! Anyway, this makes 4 posts from me now. This must be like Christmas for you.
    3 posts now. One of them was insulting and had to be deleted.

    That's good. Don't ban the people who impersonate me (and apparently bartman) which is specifically mentioned as a violation of the ToU, but delete a post that uses the word "idiot". Good job enforcing the rules! You deserve a medal.
  • adidas4fun68
    939 posts Member
    edited March 2014
    JoshSherer wrote:
    JoshSherer wrote:
    I'm not your enemy. I wouldn't waste my time (other than the two posts I wrote) on a 14 year old who is abusing a gimmick that wasn't even funny when it was first created 15 years ago.

    Actually, I don't really waste my time on most topics other than my own. You should feel honored just to have my presence here and to see me make 2 posts in your terrible topic. And believe me, I wouldn't be here if not for EA taking months to give us a freaking level update.

    I call ****. You'd still be here complaining about the update and the fictitious amount of money you spent on donuts.

    Could be, but that would be in my own topic. Try re-reading the post to understand the point I made. Specifically, that I would not have entered this topic had they given us a level update.
    so if the update changes the fictional level number you are unhappy

    And if it doesnt change the fictional level number you are unhappy

    Got it.
  • drosax1
    4860 posts New member
    edited March 2014
    JoshSherer wrote:
    dave3490 wrote:
    JoshSherer wrote:
    drosax1 wrote:
    So Josh should we be expecting a post from you regarding the update?

    Which update? Wasn't the last one the 5 donut nonsense that I found insulting?

    They just put out one today, with guiney pigs apparently, i'm eagerly awaiting your post about it... disappointed we haven't seen one yet, i need my fix of Josh's complaints, you never, know, i think i'm now a fan of your work, i might actually agree with you :lol:

    I see. Give me time to get through the questline. Maybe I'll rush it after work. I have to see the pet and building we get before I can give a complete evaluation.

    The pet is unlocked after the building is built and looking forward to seeing your post
  • JoshSherer
    1641 posts Member
    edited March 2014
    JoshSherer wrote:
    JoshSherer wrote:
    I'm not your enemy. I wouldn't waste my time (other than the two posts I wrote) on a 14 year old who is abusing a gimmick that wasn't even funny when it was first created 15 years ago.

    Actually, I don't really waste my time on most topics other than my own. You should feel honored just to have my presence here and to see me make 2 posts in your terrible topic. And believe me, I wouldn't be here if not for EA taking months to give us a freaking level update.

    I call ****. You'd still be here complaining about the update and the fictitious amount of money you spent on donuts.

    Could be, but that would be in my own topic. Try re-reading the post to understand the point I made. Specifically, that I would not have entered this topic had they given us a level update.
    so if the update changes the fictional level number you are unhappy

    And if it doesnt change the fictional level number you are unhappy

    Got it.

    Wow...can't believe I need to explain this. I will try to break it down for you:

    -Ratman says I'm his enemy.
    -I say he isn't and I wouldn't even be wasting my time posting in his topic if not for the fact that there hasn't been an update in a long time and so I was bored enough to enter this topic and respond.

    Clear? I never said I wouldn't complain about future updates and I certainly couldn't care less if the update has a fictional number or not. But if we had an update, I wouldn't be here in this topic. I'd probably be making my own topic about it.

    If you still have trouble understanding then maybe the Internet is just too much for you.
  • adidas4fun68
    939 posts Member
    edited March 2014
    JoshSherer wrote:
    JoshSherer wrote:
    JoshSherer wrote:
    I'm not your enemy. I wouldn't waste my time (other than the two posts I wrote) on a 14 year old who is abusing a gimmick that wasn't even funny when it was first created 15 years ago.

    Actually, I don't really waste my time on most topics other than my own. You should feel honored just to have my presence here and to see me make 2 posts in your terrible topic. And believe me, I wouldn't be here if not for EA taking months to give us a freaking level update.

    I call ****. You'd still be here complaining about the update and the fictitious amount of money you spent on donuts.

    Could be, but that would be in my own topic. Try re-reading the post to understand the point I made. Specifically, that I would not have entered this topic had they given us a level update.
    so if the update changes the fictional level number you are unhappy

    And if it doesnt change the fictional level number you are unhappy

    Got it.

    Wow...can't believe I need to explain this. I will try to break it down for you:

    -Ratman says I'm his enemy.
    -I say he isn't and I wouldn't even be wasting my time posting in his topic if not for the fact that there hasn't been an update in a long time and so I was bored enough to enter this topic and respond.

    Clear? I never said I wouldn't complain about future updates and I certainly couldn't care less if the update has a fictional number or not. But if we had an update, I wouldn't be here in this topic. I'd probably be making my own topic about it.

    If you still have trouble understanding then maybe the Internet is just too much for you.
    dont care about that, perhaps you need someone to carefully explain my post to you.
  • halo_nothing
    483 posts Member
    edited March 2014
    JoshSherer wrote:
    JoshSherer wrote:
    I'm not your enemy. I wouldn't waste my time (other than the two posts I wrote) on a 14 year old who is abusing a gimmick that wasn't even funny when it was first created 15 years ago.

    Actually, I don't really waste my time on most topics other than my own. You should feel honored just to have my presence here and to see me make 2 posts in your terrible topic. And believe me, I wouldn't be here if not for EA taking months to give us a freaking level update.

    I call ****. You'd still be here complaining about the update and the fictitious amount of money you spent on donuts.

    Could be, but that would be in my own topic. Try re-reading the post to understand the point I made. Specifically, that I would not have entered this topic had they given us a level update.
    "I wouldn't be here" implies the board in general and is not specific to this thread. If you meant something else then why didn't you explain yourself better? I'm know, I'm asking for a lot..
  • Bravewall
    4244 posts Member
    edited March 2014
    JoshSherer wrote:
    Bravewall wrote:
    3 posts now. One of them was insulting and had to be deleted.

    That's good. Don't ban the people who impersonate me (and apparently bartman) which is specifically mentioned as a violation of the ToU, but delete a post that uses the word "idiot". Good job enforcing the rules! You deserve a medal.
    I don't think I deserve a medal, but I like to think I do a good job of deleting insults. It's really not that hard. :D

    I'll tell you, what I tell everyone who wants to see you banned: Just ignore him.
  • JoshSherer
    1641 posts Member
    edited March 2014
    JoshSherer wrote:
    JoshSherer wrote:
    JoshSherer wrote:
    I'm not your enemy. I wouldn't waste my time (other than the two posts I wrote) on a 14 year old who is abusing a gimmick that wasn't even funny when it was first created 15 years ago.

    Actually, I don't really waste my time on most topics other than my own. You should feel honored just to have my presence here and to see me make 2 posts in your terrible topic. And believe me, I wouldn't be here if not for EA taking months to give us a freaking level update.

    I call ****. You'd still be here complaining about the update and the fictitious amount of money you spent on donuts.

    Could be, but that would be in my own topic. Try re-reading the post to understand the point I made. Specifically, that I would not have entered this topic had they given us a level update.
    so if the update changes the fictional level number you are unhappy

    And if it doesnt change the fictional level number you are unhappy

    Got it.

    Wow...can't believe I need to explain this. I will try to break it down for you:

    -Ratman says I'm his enemy.
    -I say he isn't and I wouldn't even be wasting my time posting in his topic if not for the fact that there hasn't been an update in a long time and so I was bored enough to enter this topic and respond.

    Clear? I never said I wouldn't complain about future updates and I certainly couldn't care less if the update has a fictional number or not. But if we had an update, I wouldn't be here in this topic. I'd probably be making my own topic about it.

    If you still have trouble understanding then maybe the Internet is just too much for you.
    dont care about that, perhaps you need someone to carefully explain my post to you.

    Your post is not relevant to the post that you quoted. And you saying "got it" implies that the conclusion of your post came from what you deduced from my own post. You either failed to understand my post in which case I broke it down for you, or you are randomly quoting posts and putting random and irrelevant responses to them which is something a crazy person would do.
  • Ratman5674
    888 posts
    edited March 2014
    Ratman does not impersonate Bartman and he defiantly does not impersonate josh
  • JoshSherer
    1641 posts Member
    edited March 2014
    JoshSherer wrote:
    JoshSherer wrote:
    I'm not your enemy. I wouldn't waste my time (other than the two posts I wrote) on a 14 year old who is abusing a gimmick that wasn't even funny when it was first created 15 years ago.

    Actually, I don't really waste my time on most topics other than my own. You should feel honored just to have my presence here and to see me make 2 posts in your terrible topic. And believe me, I wouldn't be here if not for EA taking months to give us a freaking level update.

    I call ****. You'd still be here complaining about the update and the fictitious amount of money you spent on donuts.

    Could be, but that would be in my own topic. Try re-reading the post to understand the point I made. Specifically, that I would not have entered this topic had they given us a level update.
    "I wouldn't be here" implies the board in general and is not specific to this thread. If you meant something else then why didn't you explain yourself better? I'm know, I'm asking for a lot..

    "I wouldn't be here" only implies the board in general if you completely ignore all of the sentences prior to it and take it out of context. I said I'd never waste my time with being his enemy and then I further said I wouldn't even be here if they gave an update. It doesn't imply the forum as a whole.
  • Excruciator69
    697 posts
    edited March 2014
    In all honesty, Josh sucks way less than Ratman.
  • JoshSherer
    1641 posts Member
    edited March 2014
    Bravewall wrote:
    JoshSherer wrote:
    Bravewall wrote:
    3 posts now. One of them was insulting and had to be deleted.

    That's good. Don't ban the people who impersonate me (and apparently bartman) which is specifically mentioned as a violation of the ToU, but delete a post that uses the word "idiot". Good job enforcing the rules! You deserve a medal.
    I don't think I deserve a medal, but I like to think I do a good job of deleting insults. It's really not that hard. :D

    I'll tell you, what I tell everyone who wants to see you banned: Just ignore him.

    The key difference between myself and my impersonators (and Ratman) is that I didn't violate the rules, while they did. You may be good at deleting insults, but you're fairly terrible at deleting impersonators which is from the same rulebook that you vowed to enforce.
  • Ratman5674
    888 posts
    edited March 2014
    Ratman is hurt


    He's not really
  • JoshSherer
    1641 posts Member
    edited March 2014
    In all honesty, Josh sucks way less than Ratman.

    See? The person who arguably dislikes me more than anyone else on this forum seems to like me more than Ratman. That speaks volumes.
  • MaxxSpider
    5465 posts Member
    edited March 2014
    In all honesty, Josh sucks way less than Ratman.

    it's a tough call
  • Ratman5674
    888 posts
    edited March 2014
    How is ratman impersonating josh

    Tell ratman now
  • Excruciator69
    697 posts
    edited March 2014
    JoshSherer wrote:
    In all honesty, Josh sucks way less than Ratman.

    See? The person who arguably dislikes me more than anyone else on this forum seems to like me more than Ratman. That speaks volumes.

    It's completely true. I like Josh more than Ratman.

    Ratman is like some weird off-brand version of Hodor from Game of Thrones except Ratman has a slightly larger vocabulary and no real narrative purpose.
  • Bravewall
    4244 posts Member
    edited March 2014
    JoshSherer wrote:
    The key difference between myself and my impersonators (and Ratman) is that I didn't violate the rules.
    :lol: That's funny.
This discussion has been closed.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.