Just read an article about this year's tree house of horror that reveals we'll be seeing current Simpsons meet their original Teacy Ulman Show versions.
IF WE DONT GET THOSE AS SKINS OR SEPARATE CHARACTERS I WILL BURN YOUR WORLD TO THE GROUND EA!!!!! YA HEAR ME??
it makes me wonder if they're planning something different for Halloween based on this idea. The article doesnt mention if it's the whole episode or just one of several vignettes as per usual.
I find it unlikely that we will see content from the upcoming Halloween episode in the game update that is just around the corner. I mean, we'd be seeing what was going to happen well in advance. Doesn't the developers usually lean towards the classic Halloween content?
It fascinates me how many medical terms for conditions are eventually considered "horrible words."
Or, in the case of "idiot" and "moron" the medical label simply stops applying because the meaning has changed.
(Many alternatives for "horrible words" also eventually become "horrible words." Language is funny.)
Replies
:? You still doing this? I'm all about running jokes. And I usually take them further than I should. You sir are persistent.
Cool, I want the original skins!
LMAO!!!! Okay... best pic I have seen so far. :thumbup:
just google EW simpsons and you'll find it.
it makes me wonder if they're planning something different for Halloween based on this idea. The article doesnt mention if it's the whole episode or just one of several vignettes as per usual.
(Also, I'm just waiting for someone to come along and tell you that you are taking this to heart too much.)
Good point. Would be weird having duplicate Simpsons running around though.
Yeah, there seem to be a lot of people on this board suffering from a serious irony deficiency.
Often, but the Mayan calendar was from that year's episode, just as an example. They can mix content from 20 years ago with content from this year.
Aww... but it was a really good pic.
It's a horrible word and I do not like it being directed towards me
Is it funny, yes (only because I know what it's referencing). Does it contain a derogatory term, also yes.
Edit: Referencing as to the movie. Didn't see it was directed towards another forum member, which I believe is against forum rules.
It fascinates me how many medical terms for conditions are eventually considered "horrible words."
Or, in the case of "idiot" and "moron" the medical label simply stops applying because the meaning has changed.
(Many alternatives for "horrible words" also eventually become "horrible words." Language is funny.)
I think he's the old one too