Hmmm. Ok. I've only got a tenuous idea to go on, but an idea of similar strength nailed us a villain last time, so I guess I'm going to try following my gut again.
One of the Day 2 behaviors of Pollard's that raised my suspicion was the fact that he logged on and immediately cast a vote for Juliet at the beginning of the day. I called him out on it, and then Juliet sort of explained/justified his behavior. 40 minutes later, Pollard re-appears out of the blue and removes his vote for Juliet (it's the very next post in the thread). Is it possible that they orchestrated the whole situation to try to publicly separate themselves? I don't know. But at this point, it's the best idea I have.
Open to other options, if someone has a stronger theory....
Can't find anything in the story nor can i derive something from peoples behaviour.
No, everyone has been pretty quiet and or unrevealing
I would try to be more outspoken but there are no real leads I can see from the story nor the people still in the game. There are probably many clues in the morning and evening messages but they are really well hidden.
++Wilki
Don't think he has been voted for so far for day 3. Can't really justify my vote. :oops:
I'm gonna have a look at who was amongst the pollard votes/against the bandwagon again.
His partner must be amongst these two categories?
After reading the posts, my money is on either Juliet or Yukon.
Juliet for the reason that Jae posted.
Yukon for her "defense" of Pollard. Not only did she speak against the bandwagon but she suggested other suspicious players. I say, suspicious because of the wording she used to explain why we hadn't posted much. She kinda made us all look suspicious for not talking enough. Possibly to take votes away from Pollard or to keep him from getting more. This was the next post after Pollard listed the 3 of us off.
Hmmm. Ok. I've only got a tenuous idea to go on, but an idea of similar strength nailed us a villain last time, so I guess I'm going to try following my gut again.
One of the Day 2 behaviors of Pollard's that raised my suspicion was the fact that he logged on and immediately cast a vote for Juliet at the beginning of the day. I called him out on it, and then Juliet sort of explained/justified his behavior. 40 minutes later, Pollard re-appears out of the blue and removes his vote for Juliet (it's the very next post in the thread). Is it possible that they orchestrated the whole situation to try to publicly separate themselves? I don't know. But at this point, it's the best idea I have.
Open to other options, if someone has a stronger theory....
++Juliet603
I'm too lazy this game to "orchastrate" a plan like that
On another note, our wifi has been down for over 24 hours now, ****?! I miss Netflix
Just realised I might not be here to vote tomorrow so ++Yukongirl for the reasons I gave yesterday. I expect she'll vote me back now to give me 2
If pointing out the obvious makes me look guilty, so be it. Not playing thus game any differently than I've played any other. Johnny accused me of being a villain last game as well. I wasn't BTW.
Not even going to present a defense because I don't believe it will matter. If not me, it will probably be some other innocent.
Hmmm. Ok. I've only got a tenuous idea to go on, but an idea of similar strength nailed us a villain last time, so I guess I'm going to try following my gut again.
One of the Day 2 behaviors of Pollard's that raised my suspicion was the fact that he logged on and immediately cast a vote for Juliet at the beginning of the day. I called him out on it, and then Juliet sort of explained/justified his behavior. 40 minutes later, Pollard re-appears out of the blue and removes his vote for Juliet (it's the very next post in the thread). Is it possible that they orchestrated the whole situation to try to publicly separate themselves? I don't know. But at this point, it's the best idea I have.
Open to other options, if someone has a stronger theory....
++Juliet603
:shock: I
Yep.. I look at how people post. After pollard got 2 votes he then voted for Juliet.. Why?
I have to admit that seeing my name voted for so early in the day was a shock, and it did cross my mind that sometimes people jump on bandwagons, so maybe seeing my name up there might stick in people's minds and I might end up getting more votes later on :hunf: but when Pollard explained his reasons I figured that was fair enough. Maybe he just didn't want to miss the deadline again?
Anyway, I agree Roses being killed was probably a random shot in the dark. No one seemed particularly suspicious on the first day so the villains were probably as clueless as the rest of us.
Now if it were me and I were innocent, I would have thrown a vote to Pollard in making his total 3. Unless I knew something.. The part about " understanding when he explained his reasons and that it was "fair enough" does not mak sense.. *and* she goes on to make an excuse for his vote.. That he did not want to miss the deadlin. :roll:
Seriously.. Who makes an excuse for someone that just voted for them that early in a round?
I should be around a good deal this weekend, I don't think I'm going to have a whole lot going on so --juliet603
I'm gonna be upset if something comes up and I can't vote though . Sooo.... what now?
Only thing I can gleam from reading the morning messages again is that whoever is santa's littlt helper may have a role like guesser or prophet, as wiggum was so intent that he was a "witness" to the first crime.
:roll:
Now just 30 minutes later (as in wait 30 minutes after I post before you post So it doesn't look suspicious)
Only thing I can gleam from reading the morning messages again is that whoever is santa's littlt helper may have a role like guesser or prophet, as wiggum was so intent that he was a "witness" to the first crime.
I thought the same thing!
This is one of the things I had highlighted as a red flag.
Hmmm. Ok. I've only got a tenuous idea to go on, but an idea of similar strength nailed us a villain last time, so I guess I'm going to try following my gut again.
One of the Day 2 behaviors of Pollard's that raised my suspicion was the fact that he logged on and immediately cast a vote for Juliet at the beginning of the day. I called him out on it, and then Juliet sort of explained/justified his behavior. 40 minutes later, Pollard re-appears out of the blue and removes his vote for Juliet (it's the very next post in the thread). Is it possible that they orchestrated the whole situation to try to publicly separate themselves? I don't know. But at this point, it's the best idea I have.
Open to other options, if someone has a stronger theory....
++Juliet603
I'm too lazy this game to "orchastrate" a plan like that
On another note, our wifi has been down for over 24 hours now, ****?! I miss Netflix
Just realised I might not be here to vote tomorrow so ++Yukongirl for the reasons I gave yesterday. I expect she'll vote me back now to give me 2
Why vote for Yukon? Why not Jae?
Same pattern? Could Yukon be villain #3? After all her screenshot was of her reading Juliet's post..
Could it be?
Right now I am suspicious of Juliet.. For the reasons stated.
I'm not really suspicious of anyone but I've got a forced vote and I do think Juliet is involved enough in these games to do something like that. I was her and Johnny's villain partner for like one or two game days and I thought she would.
If pointing out the obvious makes me look guilty, so be it. Not playing thus game any differently than I've played any other. Johnny accused me of being a villain last game as well. I wasn't BTW.
Not even going to present a defense because I don't believe it will matter. If not me, it will probably be some other innocent.
Okay, enjoy the rest of your game...
During the last game I pointed out that you were protecting urlaub, I thought that made you villain partners. I WAS right about you protecting him and you being his partner. I didn't know until the game ended that everyone had a partner. If you check, you'll see that I was protecting Anna at the time. She was one of my partners.
My vote for urlaub was the 100% correct move.
If pointing out the obvious makes me look guilty, so be it. Not playing thus game any differently than I've played any other. Johnny accused me of being a villain last game as well. I wasn't BTW.
Not even going to present a defense because I don't believe it will matter. If not me, it will probably be some other innocent.
Okay, enjoy the rest of your game...
During the last game I pointed out that you were protecting urlaub, I thought that made you villain partners. I WAS right about you protecting him and you being his partner. I didn't know until the game ended that everyone had a partner. If you check, you'll see that I was protecting Anna at the time. She was one of my partners.
My vote for urlaub was the 100% correct move.
If pointing out the obvious makes me look guilty, so be it. Not playing thus game any differently than I've played any other. Johnny accused me of being a villain last game as well. I wasn't BTW.
Not even going to present a defense because I don't believe it will matter. If not me, it will probably be some other innocent.
Okay, enjoy the rest of your game...
During the last game I pointed out that you were protecting urlaub, I thought that made you villain partners. I WAS right about you protecting him and you being his partner. I didn't know until the game ended that everyone had a partner. If you check, you'll see that I was protecting Anna at the time. She was one of my partners.
My vote for urlaub was the 100% correct move.
Right because he wasn't a villain?!?
Because he wasn't MY partner and you WERE protecting him. I noticed.
Why is this so hard to understand?!?
If pointing out the obvious makes me look guilty, so be it. Not playing thus game any differently than I've played any other. Johnny accused me of being a villain last game as well. I wasn't BTW.
Not even going to present a defense because I don't believe it will matter. If not me, it will probably be some other innocent.
Okay, enjoy the rest of your game...
During the last game I pointed out that you were protecting urlaub, I thought that made you villain partners. I WAS right about you protecting him and you being his partner. I didn't know until the game ended that everyone had a partner. If you check, you'll see that I was protecting Anna at the time. She was one of my partners.
My vote for urlaub was the 100% correct move.
Right because he wasn't a villain?!?
Because he wasn't MY partner and you WERE protecting him. I noticed.
Why is this so hard to understand?!?
Doesn't make you any less wrong though does it? That's pretty easy to understand. Not all partners are villains in a CG either.
If pointing out the obvious makes me look guilty, so be it. Not playing thus game any differently than I've played any other. Johnny accused me of being a villain last game as well. I wasn't BTW.
Not even going to present a defense because I don't believe it will matter. If not me, it will probably be some other innocent.
Okay, enjoy the rest of your game...
During the last game I pointed out that you were protecting urlaub, I thought that made you villain partners. I WAS right about you protecting him and you being his partner. I didn't know until the game ended that everyone had a partner. If you check, you'll see that I was protecting Anna at the time. She was one of my partners.
My vote for urlaub was the 100% correct move.
Right because he wasn't a villain?!?
Because he wasn't MY partner and you WERE protecting him. I noticed.
Why is this so hard to understand?!?
Doesn't make you any less wrong though does it? That's pretty easy to understand. Not all partners are villains in a CG either.
I really do get what you're saying, I got an innocent lynched.
It was the right move.
MC was Bart, Anna was Lisa, I was Milhouse.
On the first day, MC and I both voted to save Anna from being lynched. I had to vote to save her from being lynched on the 2nd day.
If she would have been killed, it could have put a target on MC and I. I couldn't let that happen. When I caught the fact that you were protecting Urlaub, the vote was easy for me. Try to look at it from my point of view. Our team also had 3 night kills that were used with 100% accuracy.
You're welcome.
I did feel bad that I helped to get urlaub lynched and by extension, you killed but I was thinking about the BIG picture.
I really hope there are no hard feelings.
I do think some of what you've said is suspicious but I'm actually leaning more toward Juliet as Pollards partner. Not because of this conversation but because of Mark's post. I checked pollard and juliet's back and forth. They do post about a half an hour apart. One then the other.
Replies
No, everyone has been pretty quiet and or unrevealing
One of the Day 2 behaviors of Pollard's that raised my suspicion was the fact that he logged on and immediately cast a vote for Juliet at the beginning of the day. I called him out on it, and then Juliet sort of explained/justified his behavior. 40 minutes later, Pollard re-appears out of the blue and removes his vote for Juliet (it's the very next post in the thread). Is it possible that they orchestrated the whole situation to try to publicly separate themselves? I don't know. But at this point, it's the best idea I have.
Open to other options, if someone has a stronger theory....
++Juliet603
I would try to be more outspoken but there are no real leads I can see from the story nor the people still in the game. There are probably many clues in the morning and evening messages but they are really well hidden.
++Wilki
Don't think he has been voted for so far for day 3. Can't really justify my vote. :oops:
His partner must be amongst these two categories?
After reading the posts, my money is on either Juliet or Yukon.
Juliet for the reason that Jae posted.
Yukon for her "defense" of Pollard. Not only did she speak against the bandwagon but she suggested other suspicious players. I say, suspicious because of the wording she used to explain why we hadn't posted much. She kinda made us all look suspicious for not talking enough. Possibly to take votes away from Pollard or to keep him from getting more. This was the next post after Pollard listed the 3 of us off.
I'm too lazy this game to "orchastrate" a plan like that
On another note, our wifi has been down for over 24 hours now, ****?! I miss Netflix
Just realised I might not be here to vote tomorrow so ++Yukongirl for the reasons I gave yesterday. I expect she'll vote me back now to give me 2
Not even going to present a defense because I don't believe it will matter. If not me, it will probably be some other innocent.
Okay, enjoy the rest of your game...
:shock: I
Yep.. I look at how people post. After pollard got 2 votes he then voted for Juliet.. Why?
Juliet then posted this.
Now if it were me and I were innocent, I would have thrown a vote to Pollard in making his total 3. Unless I knew something.. The part about " understanding when he explained his reasons and that it was "fair enough" does not mak sense.. *and* she goes on to make an excuse for his vote.. That he did not want to miss the deadlin. :roll:
Seriously.. Who makes an excuse for someone that just voted for them that early in a round?
But then at 6:39 pollard posts this.
:roll:
Now just 30 minutes later (as in wait 30 minutes after I post before you post So it doesn't look suspicious)
Juliet says This.
This is one of the things I had highlighted as a red flag.
Now this...
Why vote for Yukon? Why not Jae?
Same pattern? Could Yukon be villain #3? After all her screenshot was of her reading Juliet's post..
Could it be?
Right now I am suspicious of Juliet.. For the reasons stated.
++Juliet603
For the reasons stated in the previous message.. I will be watching, but this is as good a premise as I've seen at this point.
++Juliet
During the last game I pointed out that you were protecting urlaub, I thought that made you villain partners. I WAS right about you protecting him and you being his partner. I didn't know until the game ended that everyone had a partner. If you check, you'll see that I was protecting Anna at the time. She was one of my partners.
My vote for urlaub was the 100% correct move.
Right because he wasn't a villain?!?
Because he wasn't MY partner and you WERE protecting him. I noticed.
Why is this so hard to understand?!?
Doesn't make you any less wrong though does it? That's pretty easy to understand. Not all partners are villains in a CG either.
*where's the damn popcorn smiley?!?*
I really do get what you're saying, I got an innocent lynched.
It was the right move.
MC was Bart, Anna was Lisa, I was Milhouse.
On the first day, MC and I both voted to save Anna from being lynched. I had to vote to save her from being lynched on the 2nd day.
If she would have been killed, it could have put a target on MC and I. I couldn't let that happen. When I caught the fact that you were protecting Urlaub, the vote was easy for me. Try to look at it from my point of view. Our team also had 3 night kills that were used with 100% accuracy.
You're welcome.
I did feel bad that I helped to get urlaub lynched and by extension, you killed but I was thinking about the BIG picture.
I really hope there are no hard feelings.
I do think some of what you've said is suspicious but I'm actually leaning more toward Juliet as Pollards partner. Not because of this conversation but because of Mark's post. I checked pollard and juliet's back and forth. They do post about a half an hour apart. One then the other.