EA Forums - Banner

Law & Order: Simpson's Victims Unit (Day 7 ends Thursday at 10:30 PM AWST)

Replies

  • brandonl1226
    5831 posts Member
    edited July 2015
    Morning Message - Day 4
    Story:
    After the death of her Mother, Lisa was forced to fend for herself. She tried to connect to her spiritually, but it seems this time that the dead can no longer help. She continued to roam the town by herself. She tried to think of happy things to cheer her up, but everything just made her sadder. Not even the thought of unicorns could cheer her up. She made her way to a dark alley and sat down.

    "I miss my mum, I miss my dad, I miss my sister, I even miss my brother." A crying Lisa said.

    She then stopped crying as she heard a noise coming from the darkness.

    "Yo, little chicky babe. Could you be quiet, I'm trying to hide here." Said Snake.

    "As am I." Lisa replied.

    "You? What did you do? Murder a tree? Hahahaha...haha." Snake laughed at her.

    "My mum murdered her sister and I ran away with her." Lisa said with tears in her eyes again.

    "Whoa, really? That babe is so fine. I'd murder a million Apus for her. So where is she now?" Snake replied.

    "She's dead. The police killed her." Lisa said as she started to cry.

    "Wait, that means you're like target number 1. The police wouldn't even care if they found me." Snake added.

    "I guess that means I'm more dangerous than you." Lisa said with a smile.

    "Hahaha! That's a good one, little chick." Replied Snake.

    "What's so funny? You said it yourself, I'm one of the most searched for criminals at the moment. What crime have you ever committed that's made you more wanted?" Lisa asked.

    "How about the murder of an 8 year old girl?" Snake said angrily.

    "Yeah, like that would give you any street credit." Lisa laughed.

    "How do you think you're going to survive? You couldn't even hurt a fly, how will you defeat all these cops?" Snake asked.

    "If I ever see any of them, I'm going to shoot them. I'll shoot them all and avenge my mum. "Lisa said in a rage.

    "Hahaha..haha. Sure, let's see how brave you are." Snake said.

    Snake handed Lisa his gun.

    "What do you want me to do with this?" Lisa asked.

    "I want to see if you're capable of killing anybody. Go find someone and shoot them." Snake told her.

    "No, I don't want to do that." Lisa replied.

    "See, I knew it. Leave it to the real criminals, lil' babe." Snake said as he started to walk away.

    "I'll show you". Lisa said.

    Lisa stood up, checked the gun, aimed it at Snake and shot him. Once she saw his lifeless body, she couldn't believe what she had done. What has she become? Then she remembered why she's doing this. To avenge her mother's death. Lisa found a renewed energy for this mission and she took off to find more victims.

    Dead Players:
    1. Annette (Principal Skinner, Springfielder, Good)
    2. Roses (Lionel Hutz, Lawyer, Good)
    3. Pollard (Marge, Villain, Bad)
    4. GlassHammer (Mr. Burns, Springfielder, Good)
    5. Juliet (Ned Flanders, Springfielder, Good)
    6. Wij (Snake, Criminal, Good)

    Forced vote:
    Johnny, Yukon, Crosby, Fmust.

    Yukon has been sent to jail and is silenced. She is allowed one 160 character message for the day.

    Day 4 ends Monday at 10:30 PM AWST
  • johnny50373
    2768 posts Member
    edited July 2015
    Well, Wij's location makes sense.
  • Wijsheid
    9653 posts Member
    edited July 2015
    Thought it was obvious that i wasn't a villain. Brandon saud it almost literally in an evening message. Dumb move of the villains.

    Good luck good Springfielders!
  • ghallmark814
    2337 posts Member
    edited July 2015
    Did not expect this.. For some reason I had the feeling YG was going.

    My first thought.. Whoever is deciding on the kills is an experienced player. In the last game ( I was a villain) I kept saying we need to get rid of Wij. He is a great player and we don't want him to be around if we make mistakes.

    Anybody have an idea about the silencing?

    <going to reread notes>

  • wilki1999
    3965 posts Member
    edited July 2015
    I think the silencer is either a villain, or a third party. It's not helpful to springfielders, so they can't be a springfielder.

    I'm looking for things that people say to cover themselves. Little things, that's what was used last game. They need to be thoroughly found, but sometimes it's as simple as denial, or stating things that you know are true. That's what I picked up from villainous behaviour last game
  • ghallmark814
    2337 posts Member
    edited July 2015
    The line Lisa continues to roam Springfield by herself seems weird to me.

    Edit.. I should have said, "all the emphasis on her being alone" seems weird to me.
  • jae_bazz
    5730 posts Member
    edited July 2015
    Wait, so Wij's special role was criminal, but he was good? Do you think he was the traitor?

    Nope, that can't be right because then he wouldn't be dead. :?
  • henpot7514
    6010 posts Member
    edited July 2015
    wilki1999 wrote:
    I think the silencer is either a villain, or a third party. It's not helpful to springfielders, so they can't be a springfielder.

    I'm looking for things that people say to cover themselves. Little things, that's what was used last game. They need to be thoroughly found, but sometimes it's as simple as denial, or stating things that you know are true. That's what I picked up from villainous behaviour last game

    I agree that the silencing thing isn't helpful! I don't think a villain would have that role though?
    Here's a stupid thought that's just sprung up - do we think the people who are being silenced are innocents? The reason I say this is Wij just said that Brandon 'literally' expressed he was innocent? I don't remember seeing any such thing. But he was silenced and turns out he was innocent.

    It was clear in the evening message that Brandon is leaving no clues in the evening/morning messages so I think we need to look at the pollard thing again, and try and think of reasons why the others were killed.

    @ghallmark Lisa is alone because Marge is dead.
  • johnny50373
    2768 posts Member
    edited July 2015
    henpot7514 wrote:
    wilki1999 wrote:
    I think the silencer is either a villain, or a third party. It's not helpful to springfielders, so they can't be a springfielder.

    I'm looking for things that people say to cover themselves. Little things, that's what was used last game. They need to be thoroughly found, but sometimes it's as simple as denial, or stating things that you know are true. That's what I picked up from villainous behaviour last game

    I agree that the silencing thing isn't helpful! I don't think a villain would have that role though?
    Here's a stupid thought that's just sprung up - do we think the people who are being silenced are innocents? The reason I say this is Wij just said that Brandon 'literally' expressed he was innocent? I don't remember seeing any such thing. But he was silenced and turns out he was innocent.

    It was clear in the evening message that Brandon is leaving no clues in the evening/morning messages so I think we need to look at the pollard thing again, and try and think of reasons why the others were killed.

    @ghallmark Lisa is alone because Marge is dead.

    Everyone that has been silenced has been put in the "suspicious category" at some point in the game.
    I don't think a villain would silence/protect other possible targets.
    A traitor would silence/protect possible villains.
    An innocent who thinks these players are innocent/catching a bum rap would silence/protect them.
  • jae_bazz
    5730 posts Member
    edited July 2015
    henpot7514 wrote:
    wilki1999 wrote:
    I think the silencer is either a villain, or a third party. It's not helpful to springfielders, so they can't be a springfielder.

    I'm looking for things that people say to cover themselves. Little things, that's what was used last game. They need to be thoroughly found, but sometimes it's as simple as denial, or stating things that you know are true. That's what I picked up from villainous behaviour last game

    I agree that the silencing thing isn't helpful! I don't think a villain would have that role though?
    Here's a stupid thought that's just sprung up - do we think the people who are being silenced are innocents? The reason I say this is Wij just said that Brandon 'literally' expressed he was innocent? I don't remember seeing any such thing. But he was silenced and turns out he was innocent.

    It was clear in the evening message that Brandon is leaving no clues in the evening/morning messages so I think we need to look at the pollard thing again, and try and think of reasons why the others were killed.

    @ghallmark Lisa is alone because Marge is dead.

    Everyone that has been silenced has been put in the "suspicious category" at some point in the game.
    I don't think a villain would silence/protect other possible targets.
    A traitor would silence/protect possible villains.
    An innocent who thinks these players are innocent/catching a bum rap would silence/protect them.
    Why are you using silence/protect together like that? I don't see how silencing someone is protecting them, unless it's because no one would vote for someone who is silenced....

    What if the person with that role is trying to draw attention to people who are acting suspiciously?
  • ghallmark814
    2337 posts Member
    edited July 2015
    henpot7514 wrote:
    wilki1999 wrote:
    I think the silencer is either a villain, or a third party. It's not helpful to springfielders, so they can't be a springfielder.

    I'm looking for things that people say to cover themselves. Little things, that's what was used last game. They need to be thoroughly found, but sometimes it's as simple as denial, or stating things that you know are true. That's what I picked up from villainous behaviour last game

    I agree that the silencing thing isn't helpful! I don't think a villain would have that role though?
    Here's a stupid thought that's just sprung up - do we think the people who are being silenced are innocents? The reason I say this is Wij just said that Brandon 'literally' expressed he was innocent? I don't remember seeing any such thing. But he was silenced and turns out he was innocent.

    It was clear in the evening message that Brandon is leaving no clues in the evening/morning messages so I think we need to look at the pollard thing again, and try and think of reasons why the others were killed.


    @ghallmark Lisa is alone because Marge is dead.

    Yeah.. I know, but the first 6 or so lines in the message are dealing with her being sick of being alone, sad.. Alone nothing can cheer her up etc.. I'm trying to deconstruct the game messages and this just seems to be a lot of real estate just to reiterate a point over and over.. A point we already know.

    I dunno.. I might be reaching, but is it possible that there is villain silence going on parallel to Springfielders silencing? Maybe every other day or something?

    Alternate days?


  • johnny50373
    2768 posts Member
    edited July 2015
    jae_bazz wrote:
    henpot7514 wrote:
    wilki1999 wrote:
    I think the silencer is either a villain, or a third party. It's not helpful to springfielders, so they can't be a springfielder.

    I'm looking for things that people say to cover themselves. Little things, that's what was used last game. They need to be thoroughly found, but sometimes it's as simple as denial, or stating things that you know are true. That's what I picked up from villainous behaviour last game

    I agree that the silencing thing isn't helpful! I don't think a villain would have that role though?
    Here's a stupid thought that's just sprung up - do we think the people who are being silenced are innocents? The reason I say this is Wij just said that Brandon 'literally' expressed he was innocent? I don't remember seeing any such thing. But he was silenced and turns out he was innocent.

    It was clear in the evening message that Brandon is leaving no clues in the evening/morning messages so I think we need to look at the pollard thing again, and try and think of reasons why the others were killed.

    @ghallmark Lisa is alone because Marge is dead.

    Everyone that has been silenced has been put in the "suspicious category" at some point in the game.
    I don't think a villain would silence/protect other possible targets.
    A traitor would silence/protect possible villains.
    An innocent who thinks these players are innocent/catching a bum rap would silence/protect them.
    Why are you using silence/protect together like that? I don't see how silencing someone is protecting them, unless it's because no one would vote for someone who is silenced....

    What if the person with that role is trying to draw attention to people who are acting suspiciously?

    This is exactly why I put those words together. It's what's happening.
  • jae_bazz
    5730 posts Member
    edited July 2015

    This is exactly why I put those words together. It's what's happening.

    Is it what should be happening? I guess I'm just trying to think through what the intent of the role might be....

    & while we're on the issue, I feel like Crosby really threw away his one message yesterday. That raises some red flags for me.... :hunf:
  • Jblue8298
    7994 posts Member
    edited July 2015
    jae_bazz wrote:
    Why are you using silence/protect together like that? I don't see how silencing someone is protecting them, unless it's because no one would vote for someone who is silenced....

    What if the person with that role is trying to draw attention to people who are acting suspiciously?

    This is exactly why I put those words together. It's what's happening.
    I think this behavior will change as we have more historical posting to go on. I will absolutely vote for someone that is in jail, if there is something from other days to justify it.

    I do agree that this person may be targeting suspicious players.
  • maryclaire1
    6018 posts Member
    edited July 2015
    Jblue8298 wrote:
    jae_bazz wrote:
    Why are you using silence/protect together like that? I don't see how silencing someone is protecting them, unless it's because no one would vote for someone who is silenced....

    What if the person with that role is trying to draw attention to people who are acting suspiciously?

    This is exactly why I put those words together. It's what's happening.
    I think this behavior will change as we have more historical posting to go on. I will absolutely vote for someone that is in jail, if there is something from other days to justify it.

    I do agree that this person may be targeting suspicious players.

    Wasn't Crosby silenced? I don't remember him doing anything suspicious.
  • henpot7514
    6010 posts Member
    edited July 2015
    Jblue8298 wrote:
    jae_bazz wrote:
    Why are you using silence/protect together like that? I don't see how silencing someone is protecting them, unless it's because no one would vote for someone who is silenced....

    What if the person with that role is trying to draw attention to people who are acting suspiciously?

    This is exactly why I put those words together. It's what's happening.
    I think this behavior will change as we have more historical posting to go on. I will absolutely vote for someone that is in jail, if there is something from other days to justify it.

    I do agree that this person may be targeting suspicious players.

    Me too.


    Silencing Crosby, as we can all agree, doesn't really work cause he is usually quiet. Maybe the silencer is someone who is fairly new and doesn't know how he plays?
    Again, Wij is always suspicious so perhaps that's why he was targeted.
  • jae_bazz
    5730 posts Member
    edited July 2015
    henpot7514 wrote:

    Silencing Crosby, as we can all agree, doesn't really work cause he is usually quiet. Maybe the silencer is someone who is fairly new and doesn't know how he plays?
    Or maybe the silencer was trying to draw him out by forcing him to think carefully about what he said?
  • henpot7514
    6010 posts Member
    edited July 2015
    jae_bazz wrote:
    henpot7514 wrote:

    Silencing Crosby, as we can all agree, doesn't really work cause he is usually quiet. Maybe the silencer is someone who is fairly new and doesn't know how he plays?
    Or maybe the silencer was trying to draw him out by forcing him to think carefully about what he said?
    But he didn't need to say anything...
  • johnny50373
    2768 posts Member
    edited July 2015
    Happy anniversary, Conspiracy Gamers!!!

    It's been a hell of a year.
    Thanks to everyone for the great times.

    Lets roll through another year!!! :D
  • jae_bazz
    5730 posts Member
    edited July 2015
    henpot7514 wrote:
    jae_bazz wrote:
    henpot7514 wrote:

    Silencing Crosby, as we can all agree, doesn't really work cause he is usually quiet. Maybe the silencer is someone who is fairly new and doesn't know how he plays?
    Or maybe the silencer was trying to draw him out by forcing him to think carefully about what he said?
    But he didn't need to say anything...
    & he didn't say anything. I think that's noteworthy....
This discussion has been closed.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.