Battlefield 6 is Horrible
Just when I thought a Battlefield game in the future couldn’t get any worse, Battlefield 6 came out on Beta. What a joke of a game! 1 out of 10
Forum Discussion
You have to be insane to think that this is worse than 2042.
Let’s dismiss the gunplay. Which, let’s be serious, doesn’t even come close to the standard set by other FPS titles like PUBG, and the pitiful lack of destruction. 2042 is better by almost every other metric. Moreover, by the time it wrapped up its lifecycle, the gunplay had improved significantly and wasn’t far off from what we see in the current iteration. Helicopters felt far less restrictive compared to now. The maps actually resembled Battlefield’s signature scale and design, unlike the half baked jank we’re stuck with today. Specialists was a concept that never really made sense obviously.
pitiful lack of destruction. 2042 is better by almost every other metric
This game objectively has more destruction than the vast majority of shooters, and a lot of it overall.
2042 is better by almost every other metric.
Except for map design (better too small than the vastly too large maps that are 50% empty wasteland with zero cover), gunplay (far less beamy and way lless bloom), garbage specialists with BS abilities like wallhacks, terrible XP system, movement. Then of course there is also the garbage tornadoes that are just a major annoyance. BF6 is better than 2042 in almost every metric. If not straight-up every metric without exception.
