Forum Discussion
@SteveJackson wrote:
@TotosHeadphones wrote:Can I give a shout out to Steve Jones who was probably the most irritating, cringe-worthy presenter ever to cover F1.
Was? 😢
At least Jones is enthusiastic. Lazenby just looks out of his depth, he's been on the team as long as Pinkham IIRC?
Lazenby isn't even a himbo. Put it this way, I wouldn't * him to get to even Jenson Button 😃
There's being enthusiastic and then's also trying to be cool with the kids and attempting to make the viewer think that he was best mates with the younger drivers in the paddock even though they didn't have a clue of who he was. In his first year, his knowledge was woeful and in the VT links he would make jokes that would fall flat with an older audience. C4 tried to have a young fronted presenter to pull in a younger crowd when they lost the F1 contact to Sky but they forgot that a lot of older viewers who didn't want to subscribe to Sky had no other means to watch the races. He alienated a whole lot of long time viewers. In his second year he reigned it back massively, was less of an irritant and improved his knowledge. Still wasn't the right person to front it my opinion.
Hahaha! Lazenby isn't by any means great but he can make a dull race seem like an epic wacky race with * Dastardly taking out the opposition with custard pies. He's really earning his beans this year on that front 🤣 But it's good that they pair him with a decent co-presenter so you can ignore him. I like Button, I also like Davidson. I don't know how I feel about Chandhok though, depends of what type of mood I'm in!
Edit: I'm thinking about Crofty. 😅
- TotosHeadphones3 years agoSeasoned Ace@ScarDuck14 Hahaha forgot that it's an American site and a name is so offensive 🤣
- ScarDuck143 years agoLegend
I’m old school… Hire people solely on merit.
- TotosHeadphones3 years agoSeasoned Ace
@ScarDuck14Agreed but also allow them the opportunity to earn that merit. Then we won't ever be in the position where we feel people of certain genders (or ethnicities) are there just because
We really should get back on topic 🙂
- SteveJackson3 years agoHero (Retired)
@TotosHeadphones wrote:@ScarDuck14Agreed but also allow them the opportunity to earn that merit. Then we won't ever be in the position where we feel people of certain genders (or ethnicities) are there just because
We really should get back on topic 🙂
Seven pages later we are worried....why? 🙂
- TotosHeadphones3 years agoSeasoned Ace@SteveJackson We can talk about it till the cows come home, I don't mind, just "worried" that we'll forget the whole purpose of this thread 🙂
- ScarDuck143 years agoLegend
@TotosHeadphonesBut earning that merit froms from working your way up and takes time. You don’t earn merit by simply being pushed in at the deep end to fill a quota.
As for taking threads off topic.. We are infamous for it. And is far better than just single post threads screaming about something like the FIFA boards.
- TotosHeadphones3 years agoSeasoned Ace@ScarDuck14 I think you're missing the point I'm making about getting the opportunity. It's not about the quota, it's about having the facilities or means to access that opportunity. As a pure example, females were banned from playing football for how many years after the men were established with so many leagues etc. They're now only really truly starting to invest in the game. Or the fact that schools never allowed girls to play football and had to play what maybe seen as a gendered sport in Netball. Now girls have an equal chance of getting the opportunity to play at higher levels because groundwork is there to do so. There are now more mixed teams kids football. That's what I mean about the opportunity, it's up to the to the individual to take it but it's there for them to work their way through on merit. No quota, if they're good enough, they're good enough but we won't know if they aren't given the equal chance to reach their potential. We see the quota when there not enough good people, so we get anyone to fill regardless of their quality.
- ScarDuck143 years agoLegend@TotosHeadphones Not missing the point at all… I fiercely defend the right for equal opportunity for everyone. What I don’t agree with is equality of outcome
- TotosHeadphones3 years agoSeasoned Ace@ScarDuck14 Oh, are we saying the same thing? 🤣