Forum Discussion
I'm similar to you I've been playing this game since it's inception, although I don't watch ice hockey like most others.
Tonight I decided to watch a full match on YouTube, Rangers vs Minnesota.
I was shocked how much of a difference there is between the game and real life. Really tbh the only similarities was there is an ice rink and hockey players. There is zero sim aspects to the game at all. I'll explain why before I get accused of trolling.
Goalies in real life come off their line to stop one on ones. They can pass the puck more than a few feet with power. They cut out cross crease passes.
One of the biggest observations I made is the difference in hitting. Players weren't falling down on every hit, it was more rare to see them go down after a hit. Big hits weren't happing every 2 seconds to my surprise.
Also from what I saw it was nowhere near as easy for the offensive players to skate past the defence as if they weren't there.
Teams played a formation which was visibly noticeable in real life. I could see how having a proper functional formation helped both the offence and defence. Having something as simple as that in the game would go along way.
Also I noticed that when I team is penned in there is very little movement from the defenseman, they held formation. Not one looked drained after a couple of shots.
Again I'm fully aware that having a 100% sim is virtually impossible but the differences between both are staggering.
I'm still playing the game, it's what I've done for decades. Old habits die hard, unfortunately. Now I feel like its a form of self torture, I know how much it's going to put me in a mood but I constantly go back for more.. Madness, total madness 😭
Will I buy 25?
I honestly don't know, I'll hang fire until there a trial then decide.
- KidShowtime18671 year agoHero
@NeonSkyline21 wrote:
@Stubo_NHL24It's mind-blowing that you don't watch or play ice hockey. What are you basing your expectations for this game series on if not the experience you've gained through one or both of these two methods?Right? It's like going to a message board for racing games, demanding that the game be 'fixed' to fit your special interpretation of what racing is, despite never driving a car or observing traffic.
- Stubo_NHL241 year agoRising Ace
@KidShowtime1867 wrote:
@NeonSkyline21 wrote:
@Stubo_NHL24It's mind-blowing that you don't watch or play ice hockey. What are you basing your expectations for this game series on if not the experience you've gained through one or both of these two methods?Right? It's like going to a message board for racing games, demanding that the game be 'fixed' to fit your special interpretation of what racing is, despite never driving a car or observing traffic.
I've was playing this game whilst you were still in nappies. Just because I don't watch it doesnt mean I don't know what I'm talking about.
Going by your logic anyone playing Battlefield or COD can only have a valid opinion on the game if they are/were in the armed forces.
- KidShowtime18671 year agoHero
@Stubo_NHL24 wrote:I've was playing this game whilst you were still in nappies.
I guarantee that you weren't.
- 1 year ago
@KidShowtime1867 wrote:
@NeonSkyline21 wrote:
@Stubo_NHL24It's mind-blowing that you don't watch or play ice hockey. What are you basing your expectations for this game series on if not the experience you've gained through one or both of these two methods?Right? It's like going to a message board for racing games, demanding that the game be 'fixed' to fit your special interpretation of what racing is, despite never driving a car or observing traffic.
The funny thing is, Stubo's interpretation of hockey is a lot closer to real life than what half of this board is asking for which would for all intents and purposes be considered a "special interpretation" of the sport of hockey.
I mean, you would think my threads outlining the lack of real forechecking, neutral zone, offensive zone, and defensive zone strategies would be 20 pages deep if we were all concerned with the real sport, but that doesn't seem to be the case.
Stubo's observations as a "casual observer" should be taken extremely seriously if we're wanting this community and sport to grow. This game should be a great marketing tool to draw our more casual fans into the sport by giving them a somewhat comparable experience compared to the playoff hockey they just watched. Unfortunately for that audience, they can't get close to that target right now due to the AI.
- KidShowtime18671 year agoHero
@Limp_KidzKit wrote:I mean, you would think my threads outlining the lack of real forechecking, neutral zone, offensive zone, and defensive zone strategies would be 20 pages deep if we were all concerned with the real sport, but that doesn't seem to be the case.
Or maybe it's that there are real strategies that work, if you control players efficiently and properly, and there's no need to engage with your post. Dunno. Hard to say.
- Stubo_NHL241 year agoRising Ace
@NeonSkyline21 wrote:
@Stubo_NHL24It's mind-blowing that you don't watch or play ice hockey. What are you basing your expectations for this game series on if not the experience you've gained through one or both of these two methods?Can only base my opinion on the previous years games and common sense on how a human would react in real life. And I was a keen ice skater when I was alot younger.
I'm a football fan (soccer). The basics are the same, pass, shoot, defend attack, get the object in the goals.
Obviously I have learnt alot about ice hockey because of this game, you can't play something for 30+ years and not learn a thing or two. I would have probably got into the real life game if it was on tv here in the UK.
I've had many years of fun playing the NHL series, I can't say I'm enjoying much about this years. I'm clinging onto hope that 25 will be so much better 🙏